1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
crimeas [40]
3 years ago
10

Officer Smith is out patrolling his beat on foot (foot patrol). He notices 2 young men matching the description of 2 suspects th

at earlier in the day committed a home invasion. During the home invasion, a Rolex watch was taken, as was an expensive leather jacket and some electronics. As Officer Smith approaches the suspects, he notices one of them wearing a costly looking leather coat. Additionally, as he began questioning them he observed the other male subject wearing what looked to be an expensive gold watch.
Law
1 answer:
Ugo [173]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: How did Smith know what the suspects look like? Did someone see the two suspects go into the owner's house? If so who seen them? did they report it to the police? If so at what time, and what time is it now? Did the suspects leave any clues? like if it was raining there would be foot prints. Unless if they took off there shoes and had no socks on you can still tell who it is. people's toes have prints on them just like your fingers. If the suspects did not leave evidence Smith should look closely at their clothing to make sure they do not have a weapon on them. Then he should confront them and ask questions. He should tell them "there was a robbery today" then ask them if they know anything about it. If they say no tell them everything that was stolen tell them if they tell you can cross them off of the people who the police suspect. It may be a bluff but they do not know that. When they tell you where they got it wright it down and tell them thank you for your coroporation.Go to the stores they said they got it from. You may need a warrant if their story does not match up go find the suspect confront them and ask why they lied. and so on

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What crime is committed by anyone (adult) who shall kill a child three years old?
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

Pedicide

Explanation:

<h3>Pedicide means child homicide</h3>

5 0
3 years ago
Subraya la opción cuya serie de palabras tiene el mismo significado. A) viejo, remoto, antiguo, arcaico, añejo b) aumentar, incr
Yakvenalex [24]

Answer:

A) <u>viejo</u>, remoto, <u>antiguo, arcaico, añejo </u>

b) <u>aumentar, incrementar</u>, disminuir, <u>crecer, ampliar</u>

c) <u>defender,</u> atacar, <u>proteger, cuidar, resguardar</u>

Explanation:

A) Remoto es la única palabra que no sigue la línea de algo de hace años, antiguo y viejo. Remoto es algo que remite a lejanía pero no en el sentido del resto de las palabras. Entonces, las palabras que siguen el mismo significado son: Viejo, Antiguo, Arcaico, Añejo

B) Disminuir es la única palabra que significa lo opuesto a todo el resto. Aumentar, Incrementar, Crecer y Ampliar significan que algo aumenta o crece en tamaño, mientras disminuir es el antónimo de esas palabras.

C) Atacar es el antónimo de la serie de palabras que implican cuidado y protección, el mantener a alguien o a algo seguro. La serie de palabras iguales son: Defender, Proteger, Cuidar y Resguardar.

6 0
3 years ago
Russell, 45, has been suffering from a mental impairment for a long time. He signs a contract to sell his villa for $1 million t
solong [7]

Answer:

The answer is "Option c"

Explanation:

In the given question it is already declared, that Russell whose age is 45 and he suffers from the mental diseases, at this, he sign a contract to sell his villa to Andre in $ 1 million, at this, Russell's wife Katie, has the court-appointed guardian and without his permission, Russell can't sell the villa, that's why the only option c is correct.      

7 0
3 years ago
______ is a complete defense to fraud as it is inconsistent with the defendant's intent to defraud or willfulness, purposes esse
geniusboy [140]

Option B is correct. <u>Good faith</u> is a complete defense to fraud as it is inconsistent with the defendant's intent to defraud or willfulness, purposes essential to the charges.

About Fraud

Fraud is a criminal offence as well as a civil tort. Allegations of fraud in civil litigation may be based on a negligently made or intentionally made factual misrepresentation. In order for a remark to be intentionally untrue, the speaker must have either known it was wrong or been careless about its veracity. Additionally, it must have been the speaker's intent for the listener to rely on the assertion. Then the promise must have been reasonably relied upon by the hearer, and that reasonable reliance must also have resulted in harm.

To know more about Misrepresentation:

brainly.com/question/28964131

#SPJ4

3 0
1 year ago
What if judges were required to incarcerate every defendant found guilty? In what ways would the criminal justice system change
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

It would cause jails to be more packed. It would endanger corrections officers lives even more. It would have taxes raised. And could make it harder for someone whose been incarcerated for being guilty of a minor offense(such as speeding 10 over the speed limit) to keep/get a job.

Explanation:

In total it cost 5.8 Billion in tax payer money to keep prisons/jails running. An order to accommodate the mass amount of inmates that would be added to these facilities, taxes would be risen to pay for food, and necessities. Along with taxes being risen, incarceration rates would go up, and C.Os would be in more danger while trying to do basic things, such as; check up on the inmates. A C.O could be cornered by multiple inmates while trying to do a welfare check etc. And having an incarceration on your record could prevent you from having a social life, a job, a place to live.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When is Half-Life 3 going to be released?
    14·1 answer
  • Which Amendment provides the right to a speedy and public trial?a. The Second Amendmentb. The Third Amendmentc. The Fourth Amend
    8·1 answer
  • Which of these statements is true regarding the use of testimony on hair samples in courts today?
    6·2 answers
  • 100 POINTS FOR THE CORRECT ANSWERS!!! BRAINLIST!!!! PLEASE HELP ME OUTT!
    14·2 answers
  • Read the following sentence and answer the question below.
    15·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of cross-examination during a trial?
    6·1 answer
  • 4. What happens when a person or government attempts to deprive someone of something that is necessary to human dignity?
    8·1 answer
  • What is a constitution in general as it pertains to government​
    15·1 answer
  • in addition to fines and being required to appear in court, what penalty can be imposed on service technicians who violate clean
    15·1 answer
  • Select the correct text in the passage.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!