1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
crimeas [40]
3 years ago
10

Officer Smith is out patrolling his beat on foot (foot patrol). He notices 2 young men matching the description of 2 suspects th

at earlier in the day committed a home invasion. During the home invasion, a Rolex watch was taken, as was an expensive leather jacket and some electronics. As Officer Smith approaches the suspects, he notices one of them wearing a costly looking leather coat. Additionally, as he began questioning them he observed the other male subject wearing what looked to be an expensive gold watch.
Law
1 answer:
Ugo [173]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: How did Smith know what the suspects look like? Did someone see the two suspects go into the owner's house? If so who seen them? did they report it to the police? If so at what time, and what time is it now? Did the suspects leave any clues? like if it was raining there would be foot prints. Unless if they took off there shoes and had no socks on you can still tell who it is. people's toes have prints on them just like your fingers. If the suspects did not leave evidence Smith should look closely at their clothing to make sure they do not have a weapon on them. Then he should confront them and ask questions. He should tell them "there was a robbery today" then ask them if they know anything about it. If they say no tell them everything that was stolen tell them if they tell you can cross them off of the people who the police suspect. It may be a bluff but they do not know that. When they tell you where they got it wright it down and tell them thank you for your coroporation.Go to the stores they said they got it from. You may need a warrant if their story does not match up go find the suspect confront them and ask why they lied. and so on

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Describe and explain three benefits of writing a police report.
Gwar [14]

Answer:  A well-written report can prove more efficient in a court of law, speaking more logically and correctly to lawyers and judges. Possible avoidance of court: A report that leaves little material for questioning could help an officer avoid having to attend court at all.

Explanation: A police report must include four basic characteristics to be useful and understandable by those using the report. These include: accuracy, completeness, conciseness and clarity.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
New York's Truth in Testing Law dictates that<br> tests publishers must
Leona [35]

Answer:

Follow a strict protocol?

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Hello! Please click on the link and get me to 99% please!
matrenka [14]

Answer:

cool

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
A professor at the University of New Zealand noticed that whenever there were many planes flying directly over the University wh
Agata [3.3K]

The fallacy used by the teacher is called the fallacy of false causality.

<h3>How is this fallacy established?</h3>
  • The fallacy of false chance establishes a relation between two elements.
  • This relationship is false and does not present any type of interaction.

The fallacy of false causality establishes two elements in a cause-and-effect relationship, however, this relationship is false.

This can be seen in the statement made by the professor, where he shows that the passage of planes is responsible for the hot weather. However, the increase in temperature is caused by weather factors that are not influenced by airplanes.

Therefore, there is no cause-and-effect relationship between the planes and the climate of the region, which shows that this statement is incorrect.

Learn more about fallacies:

brainly.com/question/1178948

#SPJ1

4 0
1 year ago
which rule of the federal rules of civil procedures requires expert witnesses to submit written reports
Fantom [35]

The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) (Rule 26)

The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) is a requirement for the expert witness. If the expert fails to include this, then there is a high chance that the testimony can be thrown out.

I hope this helps! :)

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are federal jails called?​
    13·2 answers
  • Claire shoots Donovan and injures him. Donovan goes to the hospital. Unfortunately, his doctor is pretty sick with bird flu beca
    14·1 answer
  • The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended unless when in cases of rebellion. True or False
    11·1 answer
  • If a law enforcement officer stops a vehicle for a violation and finds a front seat passenger, 17 years of age or
    7·2 answers
  • Has this video prompted you to make any changes in the way that you view or manage your personal finances? Do you think it will
    10·1 answer
  • When there is a
    9·1 answer
  • The table summarizes the educational degrees of four applicants. There are three jobs open in this career cluster including Poli
    5·2 answers
  • BRAINLIEST!!
    10·1 answer
  • Vận dụng cặp phạm trù nguyên nhân và kết quả trong giả quyết tai nạn giao thông
    6·1 answer
  • suppose you purchase a new tablet computer. you bring it home and follow the instructions to make sure that it is fully charged,
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!