1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
CaHeK987 [17]
3 years ago
15

What if judges were required to incarcerate every defendant found guilty? In what ways would the criminal justice system change

Law
1 answer:
USPshnik [31]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

It would cause jails to be more packed. It would endanger corrections officers lives even more. It would have taxes raised. And could make it harder for someone whose been incarcerated for being guilty of a minor offense(such as speeding 10 over the speed limit) to keep/get a job.

Explanation:

In total it cost 5.8 Billion in tax payer money to keep prisons/jails running. An order to accommodate the mass amount of inmates that would be added to these facilities, taxes would be risen to pay for food, and necessities. Along with taxes being risen, incarceration rates would go up, and C.Os would be in more danger while trying to do basic things, such as; check up on the inmates. A C.O could be cornered by multiple inmates while trying to do a welfare check etc. And having an incarceration on your record could prevent you from having a social life, a job, a place to live.

You might be interested in
Harvey is a resident of California. Harvey files an action in Orange County Superior Court, California against Microsoft allegin
enyata [817]

Answer:

They would not win the motion.

Explanation:

Due that Harvey is a resident he can file it their.

5 0
3 years ago
On May 15, 2021 a high court in Accra dealt with three different cases: Case 1: Petra construction company Ltd took the ministry
Verdich [7]

Answer:

Case 1 (Fordjour v. Ahmed case on rent) and Case 3 (Giz Construction v. Ministry of Roads on Nonpayment of project ) are civil cases which entail one party by talking the other party to court over money. Ahmed was taken to court by his landlord Fordjour over rent arrears while Minirtsy of Roads was taken to court for non-payment of project by Giz Construction. Case 2 (GRA v. Melcom over Tax payment) is criminal case as it entails Melcom violating laws stipulated by the government.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following would involve civil law, but not criminal law?
grin007 [14]
B would be your answer!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hellmo bc I feel like it <br> ( I’ll do more of these?
aniked [119]
Hellmo, love it yes do more of these
6 0
2 years ago
What do you think Eleanor Roosevelt means by "concerned citizen action to uphold" rights close to home?
monitta

Answer:

Explanation:

According to Merriam-Webster, concerned can mean: having an interest or involvement in something. And the public is: the people of a country, state, etc. So, a concerned member of the public is any citizen who takes an interest in the topic being discussed

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What would be a disadvantage of tax payers and juveniles splitting court into two sections?
    7·2 answers
  • What is the only treatment item that is on both sides of the DD Form 1380 (TCCC) card?
    10·1 answer
  • What is a Good Samaritan policy in relation to alcohol abuse
    12·1 answer
  • what are the consequences to a silent partner in a partnership when the partnership is unable to pay off debt​
    9·2 answers
  • Only answer if you feel like you know it
    15·2 answers
  • Question 1
    8·1 answer
  • The elements of driving under the influence
    11·1 answer
  • What are the 3 levels of Government?
    15·2 answers
  • Some attorneys contact many experts as a ploy to disqualify them or prevent opposing counsel from hiring them; this practice is
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes a scientific law?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!