Answer:
The Police are aloud to use a non-deadly force.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
Answer:
1. No not all police officers live up to this code of ethics
2. Cvil rights violation
3. Poor judgement of the situation and lack of following direction.
Explanation:
1. As we have seen online and in the news there have been cases where an officer engages in police brutality.
2. If a police officer is to forceful or aggressive with a civilian it's going against civil rights.
Answer:
To prove a certain narrative that will help them win the case
Explanation:
If they have them testify they most likely can use what they say to help their case
Vice Versa
If they don't they probably have something that well help the opposing team
Answer:
Contract is a branch of private law. It thus concerns private obligations that arise in respect of symmetrical relations among natural and artificial persons rather than public obligations that arise in respect of hierarchical relations between persons and the state. Contract, at least in its orthodox expression, is distinctive for concerning chosen, or voluntary, obligations—that is, obligations constituted by the intentions of the contracting parties. This entry describes doctrinal and theoretical accounts of contract law with a special emphasis on the relationship between contract law and two near-neighbors—tort law and fiduciary law.
Explanation:
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Cases such as Loving v. Virginia and Griswold v. Connecticut illustrate that:______
a) the Supreme Court will rarely strike down laws passed directly by voters through the initiative process
b) the Supreme Court has the authority to overturn state statutes that contravene rights and privileges guaranteed under the Constitution
c) the Supreme Court does not have the authority to overturn state statutes
d) the Supreme Court does not have the authority to strike down sections of state constitutions
Answer: b) the Supreme Court has the authority to overturn state statutes that contravene rights and privileges guaranteed under the Constitution
Explanation:
In Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court ruled the anti-miscegenation statutes that outlawed interracial marriage, such as was the case in Virginia, unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment.
In Griswold v. State of Connecticut, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Connecticut’s birth control law was unconstitutional because it infringed the Fourth and Fifth amendments
