Answer:
D. are incurred even if nothing is produced.
Explanation:
There are primarily two types of costs, i.e. the variable cost and the fixed cost. The variable cost is the cost that varies when the level of production changes, while the fixed cost is the cost that remains unchanged whether the level of production changes or not
So, by the above explanation, we can conclude that the fixed cost can be incurred if there is nothing to be produced.
Answer:
CVP Income Statement
Sales revenue 2,300,000
Less: Total variable cost <u>1,171,000</u>
Contribution margin
1,129,000
Less: Fixed cost <u>664,000</u>
Net Operating income <u>$465,000</u>
Note:
Cost of goods sold 936,000
Selling expenses 119,000
Admin expense <u>116,000</u>
Total variable cost <u>1,171,000</u>
Cost of goods sold
473,000
Selling expenses 71,000
Admin expense <u>120,000</u>
Total Fixed cost <u>664,000</u>
Answer:
$15,525
Explanation:
Calculation for ending inventory under variable costing
Using this formula
Units in ending inventory = Units in beginning inventory + Units produced −Units sold
Thus,
= 0 units + 5,500 units −4,350 units
= 1,150 units
Formula for Value of ending inventory under variable costing
= Unit in ending inventory × Variable production cost
= 1,150 units × $13.50 per unit
= $15,525
Answer:
1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.
<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>
In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.
<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>
this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>
Answer:
The answers are A,B,C on EDGE2021
Explanation:
Please mark me brainliest
