The following is missing for the question to be complete:
A. Identity diffusion
B. Identity moratorium
C. Identity foreclosure
D. Identity achievement
Answer: C. Identity foreclosure
Explanation: Identity foreclosure is characteristic of adolescence, that is, in young people who have an identity but all ideas and traits the young person has just picked up from their parents, friends, group. Young people in this age have a pronounced identity, and are prone to discover their own identities, but also a tendency to receive various influences first of all family and then environment. In other words, young people in this age, are still not exploring other opportunities and ideas, but are adopting established patterns.
The combination of the emphatic need to explore one's own identity in adolescence and the established characteristics of family and society creates this psychological phenomenon. Identity foreclosure is, in fact, a consequence of a pronounced desire to discover one's identity, but when adolescents are still unsure of who they are, what their true traits and aspirations are, they can then adopt someone else's, from a close environment, ideas and traits for which they think they are theirs.
Social mobility is the movement of individuals, families, households, or other categories of people within or between social strata in a society. It is a change in social status relative to one's current social location within a given society.
Answer:
Explanation:
As per the Median Voter theorem expresses that " a greater part rule casting a ballot framework will choose the result generally favored by the middle voter". In this way, on account of essential political race which is intended to choose a gathering's possibility for position - being referred to .For this situation the Median Voter Theorem functions admirably in light of the fact that right now competitor need to appreciate the benefits of " Median voter Theorem" where as in the General political race which is intended to choose who possesses the position itself however in these sort of situations where a typical arrangement is accessible Median voter Theorem has it's constraints and all in all races each applicant needs to take distinctive situation on various subjects and general decisions are not uni dimensional and a large portion of the occasions these positions are politically spurred thus, that is the reason up-and-comer normally don't follow Median voter Theorem,
Example
Where up-and-comer either endeavored to follow the middle voter - Scenario where there is a nation wide or party shrewd agreement regarding a matter " Issues like battle against debasement" at that point competitor for the most part follow the Median voter hypothesis.
Second part where competitor didn't follow the middle voter hypothesis these are where applicant just need to please it's supporters or certain segment of society "Like reduction in the Tax on the well off" for these situation up-and-comer doesn't follow middle voter hypothesis.
Truly when a competitor chose to doesn't follow middle voter hypothesis applicant carried on deliberately ,in light of the fact that considering up-and-comer this diverse situation from middle voter hypothesis increment there opportunities to win or increment it's prominence in certain area of society .
To the extent the person carried on morally this absolutely has a place with the competitors claim moral standard which can not be summed up.
