The answer is: Assimilator
In sociology, assimilation refers to the people who take an idea or information from others and implement it into their own.
Several examples of assimilators are: Children who learn how to talk from their parents, people who learn from experts to find answers to a certain topic, newcomers who learn things about the workplace form their mentors, etc.
I think is the the Outback
Answer:
The concept of the world being flat has extended beyond geographical boundaries to the rapid blurring and demolition of economic ones. Globalisation is not an expansionary mindset anymore and in many cases, a strategic imperative to identify growth opportunities. Organisations are increasingly looking beyond their national markets. E-commerce and the emergence of digital and social marketing practices have led to a level playing field for organisations and customers and have redefined competition. Price wars have become increasingly common. Established brands are increasingly under threat from emerging private label brands.
Given the massive interconnectedness of the business world and emerging models of competition and growth, how can organisations maintain their core underlying brand identity? In addition to competitive market factors, worldwide external shocks like the global recession have also severely impacted businesses at both local and global level. The key question that emerges is that whether there is now a continual need for brands to adapt or face the threat of extinction if they practice consistency.
Answer:
The desirable characteristics for the members of a contemporary constitutional convention would be:
Diplomatic
Analytic
Ethic
Environmentally oriented
Critic
Empathic
Professional
With a strong CV in public matters
Explanation:
The contemporary members of a constitutional convention would be diplomatic because this characteristic would allow them to debate, negotiate and agree without any conflict.
They should be analytic because they should evaluate all arguments, proposals and defy them with arguments, to see who has the reason.
They should be ethical because they should be unwavering about influences, bribes, and wrongdoings.
They should be empathic because they should have the ability to understand the other's point of view and help someone else.
They should be professional because that would allow them to have high levels of responsibility in their actions.
They should have a strong Cv in public matters because they should know everything about in bureaucracy, in the use of influences, and the opportunity areas of the system to improve it.
