all options are true but the MOST relevant to the Court's influence is by interpreting the law, its decision on case will change society such as Roe Vs Wade. ans should be
b. Justices can change society through their interpretation of the law.
The correct answer is:
-> Habitants
Erosion and acid rain, even though they are a natural phenomena, they has intensified more with climate change and global warming. This directly affects people's lives in many ways. Cultures are little affected when they need to change habits in order to adapt to it.
Because of the big industries (business), with all their emission of gases, there have been all these natural events and eventually global warming. Municipalities are often affected when they do not have enough infrastructure to withstand the floods of many rains. In the end, those who suffer most are the citizens living in these cities
Answer:
A. organizing the energy level.
Explanation:
Hope it helps!
Food insecurity plays a significant role in food consumption for older adults. It is the opposite actually. Older adults tend to have insecurities when it comes to picking and eating foods. Older adults have a lot of prohibition when it comes to food. For example, sweets. Sweets are the cause of diabetes that older adults most likely avoid. Eating a lot of sweets may cause one body to gain and have high blood pressure, heart disease, weight gain, and many other health conditions. These are the unwanted conditions of older adults that is why they most likely tend to have food insecurities.
Answer:
Organizations are responding to social media complaints using all of the methods indicated. This provides more tools to avoid any type of repercussions.
Explanation:
- Adding non-disparagement clauses in consumer contracts. When someone downloads an app, a user must accept an agreement, sometimes so extense and complicated, that the user will just click <em>Accept</em>. T<u>hese agreements or contracts could include protections</u> so costumers don't speak negatively about a company.
- Increasing the legal staff in the organization. In the case of legal actions, the best protection is to have several attorneys<em> preparing documentation in advance</em> and <u>receiving notification of all potential complaints from community managers</u>.
- Zeroing in one statement that is not true and ignoring the rest. The community manager can take action reducing importance to any complaint created by a consumer, and disregard all related comments. This will make appear the <em>complaint as something unfounded </em>and will lose importance to the eyes of other consumers.
- Deleting unfriendly posts. The most aggressive form of control, and the one that could affect the corporative image the most. Since customers are denouncing something that feels is affecting them directly, the deletion of this complain could be seen as censorship, and tyrannic. Even though the company <u>could set rules</u> to avoid discrimination and violence on their social networks, a comment sent to get help about a situation that affects a customer directly is not correct from a <em>marketing or public relations stand.</em>