The cartoon from the 1900 publication was titled <em>"Divorce the Lesser Evil."</em>
- This was the argument of the Justice while the Church representative pleaded with the Justice to stop the fire being ignited against marriages with the immorality of divorce.
- This cartoon depicted the start of government interference or intervention in marriages by granting couples the legal right to divorce in the courts of law.
- From the artist's depiction, we can infer that marriage was being regarded as an unnecessary contract that could be terminated at will during government-sponsored and sanctioned divorce. From that period, Marriage started losing its covenant-for-life characteristics.
- At that progressive era, it was regarded as a better option to allow unhappy couples to go their separate ways and even remarry. There was no thought spared for the children of such unhappy marriages and divorces.
Thus, today, after more than 100 years, the results have been revised. Nations where divorce is allowed have multiplied in immorality. Families have been scattered. Children are adversely affected. And the world is not a better society.
Learn more about divorce at brainly.com/question/11286701
The Senate and the House of Representatives are different because the Senate has the filibuster, where one member can block all activity, and the Senate has a rule that if 60 members agree, debate is stopped and the bill is voted on. The House of Representatives will give each side an equal amount of time for debate before voting on a bill.
diversity
Cultural diversity results the forces of globalization are
actually encouraging the proliferation of cultural diversity resulting to a
vibrant diversity of people as opposed to promoting homogeneity of culture like
was feared. Globalization does not quash local culture but rather promotes
diversity by making people more accepting of other cultures.
Answer: A. Mechanical Energy
The correct answer is subjective prescriptions.
Erikson's psychosocial theory of development has been criticized for "objectively" stating what normal or average development is, because he is mixing them with subjective prescriptions. Erikson defines a healthy person as one who fits in with Western cultural norms and ethics. His theory disregards individuals from other cultures and dismisses norms and ethics that differ from Western society.