Yes, Social Contract gives the right to authorities to take action to create law and order. Social Contract is an agreement between the people and the government, which means the people agree to be ruled in exchange for the protection of their rights.
The NY Herald means the government would "Westernize" it. Mexico is not like the US or Canada in their culture or beliefs, intervention from US government or citizens would definitely change that.
Hello. You forgot to enter the answer options. The options are:
"The money functions as a reinforcer for getting a CD. The CD's function as a reinforcer for donating money. The money functions as a reward for getting a CD. The CD's function as a reward for donating money."
Answer:
The CD's function as a reward for donating money.
Explanation:
As seen in the question above, Rádio Pública Nacional participates in a campaign that seeks to raise funds to maintain its radio stations.
As we know today, radio stations do not have as many listeners as before, this is because of our busy way of life and the technologies that have made radio something absolute in some ways. For this reason, the National Public Radio looked for a way to reward those people who help it, for this reason, it offers a CD to each person who makes a donation, as a reward for their generosity.
Answer:
natural and probable consequence
Explanation:
The <u>natural and probable consequence</u> doctrine provides that a person encouraging or facilitating the commission of a crime will be held liable as an accomplice for the crime he or she aided and abetted as well as for the crimes that are a likely and feasible outcome of the criminal conduct
.
The natural and probable consequence doctrine states that an individual who aided another in committing a crime is liable for the crime committed and also for other related crimes which resulted in the process of committing that crime. For example, if an individual aids another the crime of home invasion and in the process occupants of the house where assaulted, according to the natural and probable consequence doctrine, the abettor is guilty of home invasion, assault even though he/she was not physically involved in the assault.
