Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Answer: Category points of parity
Explanation:
The category points of parity includes the elements of sales and production that a brand should posses so that consumers can consider the products useful and benificial for them.
The given situation is the example of category points of parity this is because of the fact that fast foods are considered by public unhealthy. Healthier offerings can encourage the public useful for their health.
Answer:
Management and Executive time / input
Commitment
Cost
Research
Assumptions
Review
Explanation:
Efficient utilization of resources: The most essential function of economic planning is to ensure the best use of given resources within the country. Maximum social benefits can only be ensured when the available resources are allocated and utilized in the most efficient manner.
The correct answer is the Euro.
Within the EU, members of the Eurozone use the EU as their primary currency.
Answer:
Bad, mainly because the governmental officials could accept bribes from people to change things, or take their favor in a case, or even bribe the president to pardon them from prison! Thus making the streets more dangerous with all these bad people around.
Also with the government being corrupt, the president could also appoint corrupted judges, so therefore having court cases be unwell.
Taxes could rise without good reason.
Roads and other things wont get fixed.
Government could hoard money, and the economy can fall.
Hope this helped
