Answer:
False
Explanation:
Robert K. Merton was a sociologist and a professor from America. He is considered as the father of the modern sociology. Robert K. Merton was awarded for the discovery of the sociology of science with the National Medal of Science by the President of the United States in the year 1994.
Robert K. Merton contributed a lot to sociology and is considered of great importance in respect to functional perspective when comes to the society. He along with other functionalist believed that society has many parts and every part of the society has to perform for its people.
Thus the answer is false.
Here are some of the choices I gathered:
A) There was no data, observations, or theories to support Lemaitre's idea.
B) The accepted view was that the Universe was infinite and eternal.
C) Lemaitre was a Catholic Priest and his views weren't taken seriously.
The ANSWER is A. There was no data, observations, or theories to support Lemaitre's idea.
not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
Answer:
Government has also given much attention to nutrition by giving free food items of basic use to the people below line of poverty and different schemes has been introduced by them too for rehabilitation of them. For school fees different scholarships are given to the needy students who cannot afford education.
was this answer helpful?
MARK ME AS A BRAINLIEST
