I believe the answer is Lincoln because he wrote the emancipation proclamation that had most to do with state rights
<span>Madison claimed that private rights and public good would be best protected in a single large republic rather than a mélange of small republics. Do I agree? Yes, absolutely, I agree. There's no strength in division; it is pretty obvious that in unity is strength. Just think for a seconds what will become of the United States if there are 52 countries in North America? India would be more developed had Pakistan and Bangladesh not broken off from India. Yes, public good should be protected in a large republic rather than a string of small republics.</span>
The answer is Irony.
It's not a metaphor or a simile since there's no comparison being made. It's also not personification since the church isn't given any human qualities.
The statement holds true to the fact that romanticism does not have any reasoning.
<h3>What is romanticism?</h3>
Romanticism was a movement of literature and artistic expression that was relevant during the 18th and 19th century.
It put forth the fact that the senses and emotions of living beings are as important as the reasoning for any form of expression. It also stated that the emotions are important for the development of the society.
Hence, the statement regarding romanticism holds true.
Learn more about romanticism here:
brainly.com/question/821735
#SPJ4
