Answer:
Below.
Step-by-step explanation:
These are perpendicular line which intersect at (-4, -9).
Vertical line is x = -4.
Horizontal lone is y = -9.
Do you want 5 and 6 or just 5? 5 is kind of neat.
44.5% = 0.445
4/9 = 0.4444444
You have enough information to put the numbers in order.
0.44 is the smallest number.
0.44444444.... is the next smallest number
0.4445 is bigger than the number above. 5 is in the ten thousandths place. that is bigger than 4 in the thousands place of 4/9
Finally the largest number of all is 0.445 for the same reason given above.
Six
5/12 = 0.416666
0.4
42% = 42/100 = 0.42
0.416
0.4 is the smallest number
0.416 is the next smallest number
0.41666666 is bigger than 0.416 because you are adding a bunch of 6s onto the decimal place.
The largest one is 0.42. You can put these into your calculator to verify the results. For example, 0.42 - 0.4166666 = 0.003344. Any result more than 0 will show that the first number is bigger than the second.
Answer:
92 attendees had activity cards
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x be the number of students with activity cards. Then 130-x is the number without, and the total revenue is ...
7x +10(130 -x) = 1024
7x +1300 -10x = 1024 . . . . eliminate parentheses
-3x = -276 . . . . . . . . . . . . . collect terms; subtract 1300
x = 92 . . . . . . divide by 3
92 students with activity cards attended the dance.
_____
<em>Comment on the solution</em>
Often, you will see such a problem solved using two equations. For example, they might be ...
Let 'a' represent the number with an activity card; 'w' the number without. Then ...
- a+w = 130 . . . . the total number of students
- 7a +10w = 1024 . . . . the revenue from ticket sales
The problem statement asks for the value of 'a', so you want to eliminate w from these equations. You can do that using substitution. Using the first equation to write an expression for w, you have ...
w = 130-a
and making the substitution into the second equation gives ...
7a +10(130 -a) = 1024
This should look a lot like the equation we used above. There, we skipped the extra variable and went straight to the single equation we needed to solve.
Answer:
6 pounds of peanuts 1 pound of almonds
Step-by-step explanation:
6 pounds of peanuts at $2 a pound is $12 and that leaves $6 for a pound of almonds totaling out to $18
The population of the town in 1960 is 48.80 thousands
<h3>How to determine the population in 1950?</h3>
The equation of the model is given as:
f(t) = 42e^(0.015t)
1960 is 10 years after 1950.
This means that:
t = 10
Substitute t = 10 in f(t) = 42e^(0.015t)
f(10) = 42e^(0.015 * 10)
Evaluate
f(10) = 48.80
Hence, the population of the town in 1960 is 48.80 thousands
Read more about exponential functions at:
brainly.com/question/11464095
#SPJ1
