Answer:
4(x) + 4(2)
Step-by-step explanation:
4(x+2) = 4(x) + 4(2)
Distribution property
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
It's easiest to divide everything by 3.
Answer: The answer is <em><u>-2</u></em>
Step-by-step explanation:
that is where the line starts
hope this helped
(-1,2) is a solution
y>x
2>-1 is correct
in this case yes
x+y≥x
-1+2≥-1
1≥-1 is correct: Yes
in this case no
x+y≥y
1≥2
is not correct. No
Answer:
See explanation below.
Step-by-step explanation:
The prime numbers are bold:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
a) We can see that as we go higher, twin primes seem less frequent but even considering that, there is an infinite number of twin primes. If you go high enough you will still eventually find a prime that is separated from the next prime number by just one composite number.
b) I think it's interesting the amount of time that has been devoted to prove this conjecture and the amount of mathematicians who have been involved in this. One of the most interesting facts was that in 2004 a purported proof (by R. F. Arenstorf) of the conjecture was published but a serious error was found on it so the conjecture remains open.
