Answer:
Case study
Explanation:
A case study is a kind of study used in social sciences in which the researcher observes an individual/group/event in a very in-depth manner. Case studies give a lot of information about the person or group who is being studied and let the researcher make causal inferences (because of the in-depth observation) and the researcher gets a better understanding of the situation.
In this question, the psychologist faces an ethical dilemma of needing to remove a potentially beneficial treatment. However, using a case study, she wouldn't need to do so because she could observe the autistic child in his environment without changing it, because the case study is an observing explanatory study. Therefore, the ethical dilemma would be eliminated and she could draw conclusions from the study.
Answer:
self-definition
Explanation:
Self definition can be described as the typical behaviour or character of a person. There are certain behavioral characteristics which make up the self definition of a person. For instance, a person who has a calm and composite composure will make a more positive self- definition as compared to the person who is always confused.
However, there are many environmental factors which influence the self definition of a person like the society of his/her upbringing.
Answer: All of the following statements are true regarding a short sale <u>except:</u>
- Legal costs should be lower with a short sale than with foreclosure.
Explanation:
A short sale is when an owner <u>sells his house for less money than he owes </u>in the payment of the property. The homeowner negotiates a discounted payment with his mortgage company without having to arrive with cash to cover the deficit. At the end of a short sale, the mortgage and property liens will be considered satisfied and any foreclosure process will be stopped.
Foreclosures are made by people who really do not have the money and cannot settle small fees. Although this will give you more credit deductions, <u>you will save any fees charged.</u>
In positive punishment contingent removal of an aversive stimulus reduces the likelihood that the response will occur again in the future.
In negative punishment the contingent presentation of a stimulus reduces the likelihood the response will occur again in the future.
<h3>What do positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement have in common with each other?</h3>
- Punishment can be used in a positive or bad way, much like reinforcement.
- Any reinforcer, whether positive or negative, makes a behavioral response more likely.
- Positive or negative punishments both reduce the chance of a behavioral response.
<h3>What is reinforcement and its types?</h3>
- Everything that strengthens or improves a behavior qualifies as reinforcement.
- For instance, in a classroom context, forms of reinforcement may include praise, allowing pupils skip over unneeded assignments, or offering out small rewards like candy, extra downtime, or enjoyable hobbies.
<h3>What is positive and negative reinforcement and punishment?</h3>
- By including something desired, positive reinforcement improves the intended behavior (good).
- Aversive reinforcement reduces the goal behavior in positive punishment (bad).
- By removing an unpleasant stimulus, negative reinforcement makes the intended behavior more frequent.
Learn more about positive and negative reinforcement here:
brainly.com/question/2994390
#SPJ4
