Answer: the contestants and observers thought the questioners were more knowledgeable than the contestants.
Explanation: Ross et al published a paper in the journal of personality and social psychology in 1977 titled
"Social Roles, Social Control, and Biases in Social-Perception Processes". They demonstrated that our actions and perceptions are determined by roles we have to play in interpersonal encounters; this is the biasing effect social roles have on performance.
In this instance the observers and the contestants perceived the questioners as having superior knowledge as the questioners were given latitude in how they frame the questions. Due to their social roles, the questioners were "the powerful" while the contestants and observers were "the powerless" playing out their roles and not taking into account the biasing effect.
If the roles were switched around, the outcome would still be the same with each group irrespective of their actual ability and knowledge.
True, go big or go home was often thought of that time ex.. their hair and make up style
Choosing between spending money on a new suit or a vacation is an example of <u>Social Security</u>.
No matter how much or how little you spend, purchasing a suit is a significant investment because it will be among your most valuable possessions. A decent suit allows you access. It offers chances that would not be available otherwise.
Social security is the safety net that a society offers to individuals and families to ensure that they have access to health care and to assure financial stability, particularly in circumstances of old age, unemployment, illness, invalidity, work injuries, maternity, or the death of a primary earner.
Learn more about suit here
brainly.com/question/22810654
#SPJ4
