HG Wells develops his characters in a very coherent and objective way in the story, allowing each character to extend the reader's understanding of the text.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Wells is a very effective author in character development.
- This is because he allows each character to show a different aspect of the story that allows the reader to have a greater understanding of all elements of the narrative.
- In the time traveler, for example, we can see the importance of science, the dangers of observing strange worlds, and the adaptability of human beings.
- Weena's development shows the need for contact and evolution without responsibility, furthermore, it shows how advancement and high evolution can trigger negative characteristics.
- The development of the Morlocks shows the reader the strength of the working class and the danger of neglecting it.
In this case, we can see that in "The Time Machine," Wells uses character development to show specific elements and characteristics of society and human life in general.
More information:
brainly.com/question/15771261?referrer=searchResults
The sentence structure of an "any" word negative sentence is: Subject + auxiliary verb + "not" + main verb + "any" word + object[s].
Answer:
The correct answer is actually the best astronauts in the world.
Explanation:
An object complement follows a direct object with the purpose of renaming it or stating what it has become. Certain verbs commonly attract object complements, such as to consider, to call, to to create, to make, etc. <u>It is important to remember that the object complement can be a noun, a pronoun, an adjective, or a </u><u>phrase</u><u>.</u> Study the example below:
- We consider them <u>intelligent</u>.
"Them" is the direct object of "consider". It is followed by the adjective "intelligent", which functions as the object complement. Notice that the sentence we are supposed to analyze is similar:
- We consider them <u>the best astronauts in the world</u>.
This time, the object "them" has a whole phrase as its complement, "the best astronauts in the world". It's as if we are answering a question about the object. For the first sentence, what do we consider them? Intelligent. For the second one, what do we consider them? The best astronauts in the world.
