The correct option is B
<u>Explanation:</u>
In an economy, planned investment spending is always equal to planned saving. If actual saving falls short of (exceeds) planned saving, then actual investment falls short of (exceeds) planned investment.
That is the other part of the saving paradox. If an economy produces too much, such that saving is greater than planned investment, inventory will build up, giving signal to producers to reduce output, to restore equilibrium. Such investment scheme is suitable only to communist countries. Keynes has another investment theory in his liquidity story. But investment theories are equally a posterior.
Therefore, Option B is correct
Answer: Net Present Value = -$19,062
Explanation:
First, we'll compute the PV for the respective years
Present Value (Year-1)
= ![0.6211 \times [1 + (0.055 - 0.06)]^{1}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=0.6211%20%5Ctimes%20%5B1%20%2B%20%280.055%20-%200.06%29%5D%5E%7B1%7D)
=0.6179945
Present Value (Year-2)
= ![0.6211 \times [1 + (0.055 - 0.06)]^{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=0.6211%20%5Ctimes%20%5B1%20%2B%20%280.055%20-%200.06%29%5D%5E%7B2%7D)
=0.614904528
Present Value (Year-3)
= ![0.6211 \times [1 + (0.055 - 0.06)]^{3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=0.6211%20%5Ctimes%20%5B1%20%2B%20%280.055%20-%200.06%29%5D%5E%7B3%7D)
=0.611830005
Now, we'll compute the Cash Flow for the respective years
Cash Flow (Initial)
= 
= -$209,306.07
Cash Flow (Year-1)
=
=$32,362.75
Cash Flow (Year-2)
=
=$81,313.44
Cash Flow (Year-3)
= 
=$147,099.68
Net Present Value:
= -$209,306.07 + ($32,362.75/1.141)+ ($81,313.44/1.142) +($147,099.68/1.143)
= -$209,306.07 +$28,388.38 + $62,568.05 + $99,288.10
= -$19,062
Answer:
The contrast coder's weekly salary last week was $450.00.
Explanation:
The CC charged $5.00 per record coded. The previous week she coded 300 records.
Write it like:
$5.00 x 300 = 1500.00
Though remember the hospital has a 30% benefit.
So:
1500.00 x 30%*=450.00
*0.30 if you can't do the % sign on the calculator
Sorry if it doesn't work out!
Answer:
c: increase in the bargaining power of suppliers of a critical input
Explanation:
Five Forces Framework by Porter's can be regarded as a method involving analysis of competition in a business. It's analysis dream through
industrial organization economics determine forces that are responsible for competitive intensity. The forces are;
✓potential new market entrants
✓number and power of a company's competitive rivals
✓ influence of suppliers, customers,on company's profitability.
It should be noted that Consolidation among fuel providers serving airport facilities is viewed in the five forces model of competition as a increase in the bargaining power of suppliers of a critical input.
Answer:
$450,000
Explanation:
Theodore Enterprises had the following pretax income (loss) over its first three years of operations:
2016 $ 500,000
2017 (900,000 )
2018 1,500,000
For each year there were no deferred income taxes and the tax rate was 30%. In its 2017 tax return, Theodore elected a net operating loss carryback. No valuation account was deemed necessary for the deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2017.
Therefore Theodore's income tax expense for 2018 is 30% x 1,500,000 = $450,000
Loss carry back is when a business elects to net off losses against a previous year's return as opposed to loss carry forward which is the future years' return.
