Answer:
B. are primarily designed to protect bondholders
Explanation:
Protective covenants are designed primarily to protect bondholders from future actions of bond issuer. They are also part of a loan agreement that limits certain actions a company may take during the course of the loan to protect the person who lend the money interests. They provide extra protection for the investors. Creditors use it to protect their interests by restricting certain activities of the issuer that could endanger the creditor's interest.
Answer:
$47
Explanation:
Because she can afford the 144 bushel plan, in the long run it is cheaper per bushel so you would choose to market that one to her because it is cheaper in the long run for as well as she grows more bushels.
Nurse is an example of that
Answer:
difference between supplies = $4.68
Explanation:
cost of merchandise from manufacturer if paid within discount period:
$1,200 x (1 - 40%) = $720
$720 x (1 - 10%) = $648
freight cost = $648 x 2.5% = $16.20
discount for early payment = $648 x 2% = $12.96
total cost = $651.24
cost of merchandise from wholesaler if paid within discount period:
$1,200 x (1 - 40%) = $720
$720 x (1 - 8%) = $662.40
discount for early payment = $648 x 1% = $6.48
total cost = $655.92
difference between supplies = $4.68
Answer:
Option A. There exist economies of scope between diversified business units
Explanation:
The reason is that diversification is lowering the industry risk of the business the company is in by investing in several other industries. This helps us to lower the risk and have a steady returns in the subsequent years. This means uncertainty related to cash flows is lowered and this has also increased the chances of cash surplus for subsequent years.
Furthermore, if the investments made in diversified business units possesses economies of scope, which means that we are in related diversification because we are manufacturing different but similar goods which are substitutes to each other from large to some extent. This brings economies of scope and would lower the total operating cost of company. Hence the <u>Option A</u> which says that economies of scope does add value to the company is the right option.
Option B is not preferable option as the option of investing in different businesses is choosen in the option A.
Option C is again the same as Option B and the difference is that it uses the word several unrelated businesses instead of comprehensive business portfolio which is the same thing. Hence <u>Option C</u> is also not preferable option here.
<u>Option D</u> is incorrect because when we acquire an organization it is the move of increase in risk portfolio because acquisitions are mostly not a sound investments and not a part of diversification strategy as the company is putting all the eggs in the single basket.
