1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mariana [72]
3 years ago
13

'If a nation is rich in resources then it can be developed.' Justify this statement.

Social Studies
2 answers:
algol133 years ago
8 0

Explanation:

 It would be a fair assumption to make that a country with a large amount of natural resources would be more likely to develop fastest and furthest. This could be assumed because natural resources in a country would be likely to stimulate trade at first within that country, and later to outside countries.

nikdorinn [45]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

If a nation is rich in resources then it can be developed because if an economy or a country should have enough resources they can export to countries that needs them and they can use the money for the benefit of the country or nation and with that they can develop the nation with good infrastructures and other available resources provided.

You might be interested in
This group promotes school choice vouchers and homeschooling <br> A: democrat or republican
Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer:

republican

Explanation:

Republicans are more likely to approve homeschooling and school choice, whereas democrats are more pro-public school.

8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following would NOT be used to describe an effective elevator pitch?
Juliette [100K]
What are the options ?
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pasteis de nata, a traditional custard tart, comes from which country?.
xeze [42]
It was originally made in Portugal
8 0
2 years ago
9
Alekssandra [29.7K]

Answer:

The first triumvirate is

-Mark Anthony

-Pompey

-Julis Caesar

The second triumvirate is

-Lepidus

-Crassus

-Octavian

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Why were the citizens of Washington, DC, not allowed to vote in presidential elections until 1961?
Marat540 [252]
They were not able to vote because they did not have any electors to represent them. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is an analogy for democracy?
    9·1 answer
  • In which sentence is the comparison in the correct form? A. It is the tallest building in the world. B. It is the taller buildin
    5·2 answers
  • Why might a crowded waiting room be a sign of inefficiency rather than the provider’s popularity?
    5·1 answer
  • What were the people that urged the united states to stay out of the war
    5·1 answer
  • During puberty, neurons become more responsive to excitatory neurotransmitters. As a result, adolescents
    6·1 answer
  • What do you think about pigs?<br> I am brainstorming for a report.
    6·2 answers
  • What condition must be true for a nation to exist?
    15·1 answer
  • This party is an example of a single-issue party:
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a form of primary research?
    15·2 answers
  • In creating evidence of title, a title search attempts to identify the sequence of conveyances passing ownership down through ti
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!