The correct answer is C; It is improper for Joe to assume these responsibilities as he may not sign documents using Dan's name.
Further Explanation:
Joe can't sign the attorneys name on any legal questions or documents on the titles. This is unethical as this is forgery since he isn't signing his own name. If Joe does sign off with the attorneys signature and the search was not correct then the attorney, Sally, and Joe will all be in legal trouble.
The attorney will have to review Sally's work and sign off on it. Since Joe is an attorney, he could actually sign his own name to these papers if it is within his job description and there would be no issues.
Learn more about paralegals at brainly.com/question/1878109
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
Ooooo thank you for the points :)
Have a good day
Answer:
There is little publicity compared with Acts of Parliament which may mean people are unaware a ruling exists. Control by Parliament isn't always effective. Few affirmative resolutions exist and MP's are too busy to look over them, and controls are often not used anyway. There is a lack of scrutiny.
Explanation:
1. It is a symbol of freedom
2. It is the right to be legally justified or safe
3. It allows people to be protected from danger or suspicious situations and people
4. it provides documentation long-term on serious issues
Please Vote my answer brainliest! Thanks.
The given is called a writ of attachment or an order of attachment
.
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
In the court of law the defendant is an individual or company accused for committing a crime. If the judge has pronounced a judgement in favour of the plaintiff in the case of any disputes which may be a settlement in the form of money or in the form of assets.
The plaintiff may take the help of the court or court appointed sheriff to settle the dues from defendant. So the court appointed officials will make use of their power and protect the assets being sold. And this court process is known as order of attachment.
