Answer:
$2.16
Step-by-step explanation:
divide $12.95 by 6
12.95/6=2.15833333333
round to the nearest cent : $2.16
For this case we must solve the expression given for the variable "m":
We add 5 to both sides of the inequality:
Multiplying by 2 to both of the inequality:
So, finally we have:
The solution is given by all values of m less than 4.
Answer:
Answer:
Assuming this is a rectangular prism the surface area would be 324ft^2.
Step-by-step explanation:
Surface Area = 2(lw + lh + wh).
Answer:
As the calculated F lies in the acceptance region therefore we conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the variability in concentration may differ for the two companies. Hence Ha is rejected and H0 is accepted.
Step-by-step explanation:
As we suspect the variability of concentration F - test is applied.
n1=10 s1=4.7
n2=16 s2=5.8
And α = 0.05.
The null and alternate hypothesis are
H0: σ₁²=σ₂² Ha: σ₁²≠σ₂²
The null hypothesis is the variability in concentration does not differ for the two companies.
against the claim
the variability in concentration may differ for the two companies
The critical region F∝(υ1,υ2) = F(0.025)9,15= 3.12
and 1/F∝(υ1,υ2) = 1/3.77= 0.26533
where υ1= n1-1= 10-1= 9 and υ2= n2-1= 16-1= 15
Test Statistic
F = s₁²/s₂²
F= 4.7²/5.8²=0.6566
Conclusion :
As the calculated F lies in the acceptance region therefore we conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the variability in concentration may differ for the two companies. Hence Ha is rejected and H0 is accepted.
I believe the answer would be 62.00.
