<u>House Un-American Activities Commitee</u> was in charge of investigating claims of communist activity in the government, armed forces, universities, and other areas.
<u>Explanation</u>:
House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) was responsible for investigating Fascist or Communist ties on citizens, employees and organizations in both public and private sector. HUAC was established in the year of 1938 by House of Representatives of United States of America.
The main aim of HUAC was to promote the ideas of U.S citizens that communism could be in their country and they are free from disloyalty and revolutionary activities. Second Red Scare was a phenomenon that was started after the World War II.
Answer: Someone who knows about the Holocaust ,it might not be a Jews
Explanation: The
Holocaust was an experience that possibly those that experienced it might not be alive to tell the story. It is possible the best person to write this history is not a Jew because there is high tendency that the Jews that existed then might have been killed only those that witnessed the killings will be in the best position to write about it. To me the best person to write about the history of Holocaust is someone who experienced it but not necessarily a Jew
Answer:
A:Binge-watching may improve relationships.
B:it is effective because the author provides several examples of how binge-watching increases social connections and, refers to outside sources.
Explanation:
I am in k12
Answer:
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects personal privacy, and every citizen's right to be free from unreasonable government intrusion into their persons, homes, businesses, and property whether through police stops of citizens on the street, arrests, or searches of homes and businesses.
Explanation:
I hope this helpes :)
Answer:
judicial activism
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario this decision is an example of judicial activism. This term refers to a court ruling that is suspected of having been made on the basis of a personal opinion as opposed to an actual existing law. Such as in this case since the court made a ruling on something that is not not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.
