Answer:
D. They should discuss with dean
It will be better
Explanation:
Answer:
used an analogy
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question Terry seems to have used an analogy to solve his problem. An Analogy is a comparison between one to completely different things. Since he thought the cake looked like the a bridge he saw previously he used the bridges support system design in order to hold up the cake.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.
hey fail to understand the past and current ecology of the place, its wildlife, politics and people. And this can lead to failure. Studies have shown, for instance, that conservation groups often fail to look into past patterns of human population densities in and around proposed protected area
B. When a candidate is officially nominated at the national convention.
