Evaluate the necessity of establishing industries in backward areas?

Social Studies

1 answer:

sp2606 [1]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Industry in backward areas can become very helpful to revitalize the economy and improve the standard of living of the population with the provision of jobs, salaries, and other associated economic activities. So in this sense, establishing industry in backward areas would be necessary and very helpful as well.

However, there is the issue of whether industry can survive in a backward area, or if it can be established there in the first place. Backward areas are precisely backward because they lack certain socioeconomic indicators that attract dynamic economies, like the education level of the population, or economies of scale. For this reason, it is likely that many incentives, like tax incentives, would be needed for an industry to establish itself in a backward area in first place.

You might be interested in

What’s the answer for this question?

Black_prince [1.1K]

The answer would be D?

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Isn't it a bit ironic that executives found guilty of criminal activity could serve less time in prison if their firm has develo

lisov135 [29]

Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.

2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.

Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.

8 0

3 years ago

Members of this branch decide cases that involve states rights

gizmo_the_mogwai [7]

Answer:

Supreme Court

Explanation:

Its powers include interpreting the Constitution, reviewing laws, and deciding cases involving states' rights. Its powers include interpreting the Constitution, reviewing laws, and deciding cases involving states' rights. They are special judges who interpret laws according to the Constitution.

7 0

3 years ago

It rarely matters what channel to use when expressing an emotion (phone, e-mail, etc.) as long as you express yourself clearly a

Mrrafil [7]

I agree but, what is the question?

4 0

3 years ago

The part of the US government that carries out laws is the?

pochemuha

Answer:

Explanation:

Executive branch- While they are responsible for carrying out the laws.