Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
Answer:-22
Step-by-step explanation:Just put the value -1 wherever there is x.
i think the answer is A
Step-by-step explanation:
i just think it's a
Answer:
Here look at this graph this is your answer.
Answer:
You should go with the 1st, because it's cheaper.
Step-by-step explanation:
1st plan:
30$ which include 75 mins of free calls and 100 free text messages
25 more mins * 10¢ /min(0.1$/min) = 2.5$
You will pay 32.5$
2nd plan:
(calls)100*0.3$=30$
(text messages)100 * 0.1$=10$
30+10 = 40$
