Explanation:
Ethical doubts about genetic engineering motivate a view that many philosophers favour: that genetic therapy to eliminate disease and disability is ethically acceptable, given that the risks can be overcome.
But genetic enhancement is ethically problematic. The line between enhancement and therapy is difficult to draw.
Studies show people who are physically attractive are likely to earn more than those considered to have below-average looks. Does this mean “ugliness” is a disability that ought to be corrected by genetic engineering?
Or, similarly, is having a below-average IQ a disability, something that should be subject to change through gene-editing?
4. drug use will lower academic achievement of high shool
Answer:
Here is my answer on Edg. "If someone is tested positive for STIs, they can take medicine which can cure some STIs, such as chlamydia and gonorrhea. You can also take medicine to help the symptoms although it can't be cured such as herpes."
Explanation:
Hope this helps. :)
B would be the correct answer to your question
