The correct answer is the Public Company Accounting Oversity Board.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted in 2002. It’s purpose was to protect investors and add additional oversight for corporations after a number of companies were caught up in accounting scandals and investors lost billions of dollars.
In accounting, cash receipts refer to the record of the sales made in a form of cash, therefore, credit sales are not included in this record. When we say sales made on account, this refers to credit sales. Therefore, the answer to the given statement above is FALSE.
Option (b) for a response. In order to keep the expenditure multiplier from exceeding 1, output must increase while consumption must decrease.
<h3>Spending multiplier: What does it tell you?</h3>
An economic indicator of the impact that changes in government spending and investment have on a nation's Gross Domestic Product is the expenditure multiplier, often known as the fiscal multiplier.
<h3>When the multiplier is negative, what does that mean?</h3>
The negative multiplier effect happens when a spending leak or initial withdrawal from the circular flow has further impacts and a larger final decline in real GDP.
<h3>Why does multiplier exceed 1?</h3>
The rise in the national product indicates a rise in national income. Consumption demand rises as a result, and businesses produce to satisfy it. As a result, the increase in investment is greater than the increase in national income and product. There is a multiplier effect that exceeds one.
Learn more about expenditure multiplier: brainly.com/question/28140364
#SPJ4
Dafuq is this dumb site. This is some bull the verified answers where always wrong like dafuq is the point.
Answer:
The multiple choices are
a. $240,000
b.
$228,000
c.
$216,600
d.$205,770
e.
$0
The correct option is E,$0
Explanation:
The funding required from equity is 40% of the projected capital budget of $2000,000 which is expected to be from the profit attributable to stockholders since new issue of shares is not contemplated.
In other words, dividends payable to shareholders is the net income less their counter funding of the project which is computed below:
residual dividends=net income-(equity%*capital outlay)
residual dividends=$300,000-(40%*$2000,000)
=$300,000-$800,000=$0
In essence the $300,000 is not even enough as funds expected from equity less alone paying excess as dividend
