1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
soldier1979 [14.2K]
2 years ago
11

Will give brainiest!

History
1 answer:
djverab [1.8K]2 years ago
3 0

Famines were a frequent occurrence in South Asia until 1900, and were often

devastating in impact. A series of nineteenth century famines were triggered by harvest

failure. Food procurement for World War II, combined with a crop failure, caused the

harshest famine of the twentieth century, the 1943 Bengal famine. Famine-like conditions

recurred also in 1966 and in 1972, but the extent of starvation-induced death was limited on

both occasions. Why did these episodes develop? Why did they cause death and distress on a

very large scale at times? Why did the frequency of their occurrence fall in the twentieth

century?

The world history of famines tends to approach these questions by using two keywords,

‘natural’ and ‘manmade.’ These terms are not rigorously defined anywhere, but they are

widely used as a way to analyse the causes of famines and famine intensity.2

Usually, natural refers to a large and sudden mismatch between demand for and supply

of food, caused by a harvest failure, though the disastrous effects that follow can sometimes

be attributed to a prehistory of bad diet and malnutrition. Modern famine analysts and

historians owe their conception of ‘natural’ to Thomas Malthus. Malthus used the word

‘nature’ in a wide range of senses, including the ‘natural carelessness’ with which some

populations reproduced. But one meaning is particularly relevant in this context. This

meaning is expressed in the sentence: ‘Famine [is] the last and most dreadful mode by which

nature represses a redundant population.’ In other words, famine is the inevitable result of

overpopulation.3 Using ‘Indostan’ or India as one of his examples, Malthus suggested that the

yield of land was so low here and the population ordinarily lived with so little food that the

effect of a ‘convulsion of nature’ such as a crop failure could be immediate and devastating.

Manmade now-a-days almost always refers to some sort of political action that shifts

food away from one group to another.4

It connotes state failure. The state has a particularly

important role to play because famine relief should not be priced nor withheld from anyone.

State relief often fails to be enough, it is said, because politicians believe in an ideology that

advocates weak relief, and the political system allows them to get away with it. The political

factor is especially common during wars, in despotic regimes, and during temporary

You might be interested in
Name a right , responsibility, privilege, AND role of a citizen of the united states
leva [86]

Respect and obey federal, state, and local laws. Respect the rights, beliefs, and opinions of others. Pay income and other taxes honestly, and on time, to federal, state, and local authorities. Defend the country if the need should arise.

3 0
3 years ago
Why has the salad bowl replaced the melting pot as a metphor for american multiculturalism?
tamaranim1 [39]
They maintained their own identities instead of "melting together" like described in the melting pot.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which hominin was the very first stone tool maker?
Deffense [45]
The answer is Paranthropus boisei or P. Boisei. This specie was the earliest hominin and is also described as the largest of the Paranthropus family. This species of Paranthropus lived in Eastern Africa from 2.4 until 1.4 million years ago. Archaeologists found hominid bones along with early stone age technology, which was uncovered to be bones of Paranthropus Boisei.
4 0
3 years ago
Why did northern ireland scotland and wales gain their own legislatures. HELP
Oduvanchick [21]

Because they wanted their own freedom/independence
4 0
3 years ago
Why did natives resist immigration
Wewaii [24]

Answer:

Nativism-a policy favoring native born people over immigrants.

Explanation:

Fear of losing jobs

Dislike of immigrants' political or religious views

Felling that immigrants did not fit into US society

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Identify the successes of the League of Nations and the reasons the League ultimately failed. Support your conclusions with exam
    15·2 answers
  • What is a fresco?
    5·2 answers
  • How did the Republican midterm victory affect<br> President Clinton?
    10·2 answers
  • Why was the Reapportionment Act of 1929 passed?
    10·2 answers
  • The Zhou dynasty create a fair system for advancement in the bureaucracy.
    7·1 answer
  • What was james k. polks campaign slogan in the 1844 election?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a true statement about the banking crisis during the great depression?
    9·2 answers
  • The Silk Road was “discovered” by __________. A. Marco Polo B. Genghis Khan C. General Zhang Qian D. Kublai Khan
    8·2 answers
  • Where are the Amendments located in the US Constitution?<br><br>​
    6·2 answers
  • Why did the native Americans begin to dislike the Spaniards?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!