Answer and Explanation:
Given:
μ = 75 million
SD = 17 million
Probability (x) raw data = 110 million
Computation:
= Probability (x) < 110 million
= Probability [(x-μ) / SD] < [(110 - 75) / 17]
[(x-μ) / SD] = Z
= Probability [z] < [(35) / 17]
= Probability [z] < [2.05882353]
Using z calculator:
P-value from Z-Table:
Z score = 0.98024
Therefore, probability is 0.98024
Answer:
The inventory would be valued at $75 each
Explanation:
From a market approach to valuation,we need to first of all compare the replacement cost and net realizable in order to pick the lower of both values,hence the replacement cost of $75 is lower than net realizable value of $82.50.
As a result, we can then compare the lower of replacement cost and initial cost,such that inventory can then be valued at the lower of both.
From the foregoing analysis,the replacement of $75 each per item is lower than the initial cost $76.50,invariably our inventory is valued at $75 each.
Based on the information given for her to complete her letter, she must deposit D) $12,000.
<h3>
Deposit:</h3>
Using this formula
Deposited amount=Amount invested-Original investment
Where:
Amount invested=$25,000
Original investment=$13,000
Let plug in the formula
Deposited amount=$25,000-$13,000
Deposited amount=$12,000
Inconclusion for her to complete her letter, she must deposit D) $12,000.
Learn more deposit here:brainly.com/question/1752098
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
Answer: Allowance for the doubtful accounts with a credit balance of $29,600
Explanation:
From the information that is provided in the question, the following can be deduced and the year-end financial statements should show:
Allowance for the doubtful accounts with a credit balance will be calculated as: the beginning allowance for the doubtful accounts + (the sales × Provision % ) - accounts receivable that were written off.
= $3,500 + ($1,110,000 × 3%) - $7,200
= $3500 + $33300 - $7200
= $36800 - $7200
= $29,600
