D because people can choose not to respect it so therefore it is not a duty. Hope this helps
From the wording of your question, especially the words "the following", I'm pretty sure you're looking at a list of choices that you're not sharing. There's no way that anyone can pick the right one if he can't see the list.
Answer: The research team can conclude right away that the cell line is a "cancer cell or a cell that emanates from a tumor cell".
Explanation: 'Density-dependent inhibition is when cell growth has a reached a limited density which in turn will slow down the rate of cell growth because of lack of new 'anchorage' point (new cells to adhere and be in contact with).
'Anchorage Dependence' is the need for cells to be in contact (adherence) with another layer of cells. Cells require anchorage in order to survive.
The reason why the researchers will conclude right away that the cell line is a "cancer/tumour cell" is because normal cells display density dependence inhibition while cancer cells 'proliferate' (increase in number) regardless/independent of cell density.
Normal cells adhere to each other (need to be in contact with each other) and form orderly array of cells while cancer cells do not adhere to cells and can migrate over adjacent cells thereby growing in a disorderly manner.
Explanation: Locke's most important piece of political philosophy is his Second Treatise of Civil Government. But in his first treatise, Locke explicitly refuted the idea that kings rule according to divine right (from God), and argued that human beings have natural rights upon which the government may not infringe.
Answer: The Federalist Papers
Explanation: the federalist papers written under the pseudonym *Publius* were a series of articles and essay by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. The papers were written in an atempt to sway publiv opinion and persuade voters towards ratification of the Constitution. It was commonly referred to as the Federalist and became the Federalist Papers in the 20th century.
The Federalist Papers are still relevant till date as federal judges refer to it in the interpretation of the Constitution. They are used to clarify and simplify what the framers of the Constitution intended. Their importance can be seen in how much they are referred to when making decisions; as at year 2000, The Federalist Papers had been quoted 291 times in Supreme Court decisions.
