1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olchik [2.2K]
4 years ago
6

In which two ways did the Magna Carta influence democracy?A) It reduced the taxes that people paid to the government.B) It compl

etely separated the powers of church and state.C) It declared that no “free man” could be arrested unless charged with a crime.D) It advocated timely and speedy trials for people accused of crimes.E) It took power from the king and gave it to the people.
Social Studies
2 answers:
tankabanditka [31]4 years ago
7 0

i believe its the second option

erastovalidia [21]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

It declared that no “free man” could be arrested unless charged with a crime.

It advocated timely and speedy trials for people accused of crimes.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What is human race: the history of racial typing???
Naya [18.7K]

Answer - Race as a categorizing term referring to human beings was first used in the English language in the late 16th century. Until the 18th century it had a generalized meaning similar to other classifying terms such as type, sort, or kind. Occasional literature of Shakespeare’s time referred to a “race of saints” or “a race of bishops.” By the 18th century, race was widely used for sorting and ranking the peoples in the English colonies—Europeans who saw themselves as free people, Amerindians who had been conquered, and Africans who were being brought in as slave labour—and this usage continues today.

The peoples conquered and enslaved were physically different from western and northern Europeans, but such differences were not the sole cause for the construction of racial categories. The English had a long history of separating themselves from others and treating foreigners, such as the Irish, as alien “others.” By the 17th century their policies and practices in Ireland had led to an image of the Irish as “savages” who were incapable of being civilized. Proposals to conquer the Irish, take over their lands, and use them as forced labour failed largely because of Irish resistance. It was then that many Englishmen turned to the idea of colonizing the New World. Their attitudes toward the Irish set precedents for how they were to treat the New World Indians and, later, Africans.

7 0
3 years ago
Today in the United States women are pursuing nontraditional careers as
Alex17521 [72]
All of the above would be non-traditional careers for women, as traditionally women often stayed home and did work so working itself was non-traditional.

Then we have to only ask if women are performing all of these jobs? yes, they are! so the answer is d) all of the above.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List 3 things the Federal or State Govenment does for their citizens and<br> residents? *
Xelga [282]

protection of the right.

accelerates developmental activities

distributes equal means and resources

3 0
4 years ago
In what way are executive agreements different from treaties
Maslowich

Answer:

Definition. A treaty is a formally concluded, ratified and binding agreement between sovereign states and/or international organizations while an executive agreement is an agreement between the government heads.

Nature. Another major difference between treaty and executive agreement is that treaties are legally binding between two states while executive agreements are politically binding between the heads of two states.

Purpose. The purpose of a treaty varies in all dimensions under international relations such as peace, trade, independence, reparations, territorial boundaries, human rights, immigration, etc. between the parties concerned.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements concerning moral development is not true? Please select the best answer from the choices provi
Salsk061 [2.6K]

The answer is: What is determined as right or wrong is universally defined and agreed upon.

What is determined as right or wrong usually really depended on the culture where the action is committed. For example, throwing executing homosexuals is considered to be morally wrong by people in united states. But in certain territories in Asia, this act is considered to be morally right.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Gunpowder ,tea and silk production were first achieved in which civilization?
    13·1 answer
  • Select the phrase that best describes the benefits and drawbacks of a market-based economy?.
    5·1 answer
  • Because the juvenile justice system espouses the philosophy of parens patriae, it allows for more ___________ than the adult sys
    12·1 answer
  • God's faithfulness is always linked to man's willingness to follow or not follow him.
    10·2 answers
  • PepsiCo's strategy called "capital performance with a purpose" links green efforts in businesses to the bottom line. This is an
    13·1 answer
  • What is the cultural aspect of environment? <br><br>​
    14·1 answer
  • A baker is baking muffins and cookies for big event the baker places a tray of cookies and a tray of cookies bake for 8 minutes
    15·1 answer
  • How did white southerners react to slave rebellions?
    9·1 answer
  • ________ diversity refers to diversity in observable attributes such as race, ethnicity, sex, and age.
    9·1 answer
  • Fill in the blank: purines are salvaged by the addition of _________ to form nucleotide monophosphates.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!