Answer:
valid.
Explanation:
Valid is something effective, legally binding or able to withstand objection.
In deductive reasoning, an argument is valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false. It is not required for a valid argument to have premises that are actually true, but to have premises that, if they were true, would guarantee the truth of the argument's conclusion. Valid arguments must be clearly expressed by means of sentences called well-formed formulas. The validity of an argument can be tested, proved or disproved, and depends on its logical form.
An argument is a set of statements expressing the premises and an evidence-based conclusion.
North because north is colder than the south
Answer: Accepts to give speech without any incentives.
Explanation:
Insufficient justification, in terms of cognitive dissonance theory describes about a person depending of internal cause for any behavior's explanation as any external factor causing such behavior does not exist. Treat or reward can be enough to make a person involve into behavior or avoid behavior
According to the question,Lisa can experience most possible change in behavior if she accepts to give speech without any incentives for favoring the capital punishment.She will involve into such behavior due to reward .
Both China and North Korea still have Communist rulings, therefore both of them are Communist nations.
The correct answer is B: They are both communist nations.
We can also eliminate the other choices.
A: Does not make sense, since North Korea is not even close to being the largest country in East Asia.
C: Both China and North Korea do not have Democratic Constitutions, since they are both Communist Nations.
D: No one from North Korea won the Nobel Peace Prize. I'm not sure about China.
Therefore, the correct answer has to be B.
Hope this answer helped! Have a great day!
<span>Michel Foucault referred to politics as related to governmentality and biopower. He believes in the historical approach that we need to study the history of politics throughout ages first in order to learn from the past. While he also believe in the connection of studying genealogy to the current ruler or leader.</span>
