I am not 100% sure. But I do know the answer are not 2 and 3 are wrong. Hope that helps.
Answer:
Luisa finds and corrects an error in ___punctuation_______.
Explanation:
a) The paragraph omitted a comma punctuation mark after the word "campfire." When Luisa puts this comma after "campfire," the sentence becomes grammatically correct.
So the error that Luisa finds and corrects in the passage is the omission of comma punctuation. A comma punctuation mark gives a short break in a sentence. Full stop gives a long break.
Answer:
(B) True.
Explanation:
For sociologists, there are dominant norms that regulate society's well being and any behavior contrary to these will mean a person is perfoming deviant behavior.
Often psychologists will research on genetic causes, and of course other inner motivations. While in contrast sociologists will explain deviance focusing on how social boundaries, forces, and structures pose conditions where deviances takes place.
Thus psychological explanations take a different focus, they see individuals as unique and primary unit of analysis. They believe human beings are ultimately reponsible in cases of crimes or other acts that are deviant.
The personality of an individual creates conditions for causing this deviances. Of course in some cases mental health issuses or non mental health concerns will link.
Ok good to know what the question do you want evidence to support go against or did you just want to share that factv
The boy's counsel could argue that the
sentence is cruel and unusual punishment. This is prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. The boy does not have the judgment of an adult and cannot be punished as an adult. In fact, even if the boy were an adult, life in prison could be a cruel or unusual sentence.
