Sentence outline the sentence that states what you are trying to prove-topic outline, an outline in which each heading is a complete sentence. thesis, an outline that has headings consisting of single words or phrases-the main idea of the essay.
<h3>Why
sentence are outline?</h3>
The sentence is outlined to highlight the main and important part in the essay, as directly seen by the reader, and from where they get the idea about the paragraph or context. They are the main idea and part of the paragraph.
Thus, the sentence are matched
For more details about sentence are outline, click here:
brainly.com/question/16982504
#SPJ1
Julius Caesar is a play deeply concerned with the idea of rhetoric, or persuasion. The play is driven by persuasion. Cassius convinces Brutus that Caesar must die, setting the story in motion. The resolution of the plot is decided by Antony's speech to the plebeians. Shakespeare sees rhetoric as one of the most powerful forces in the world; able to topple kings and crown them. The play, Julius Caesar, examines what gives rhetoric its power by pitting Brutus's speech against Mark Antony's. Shakespeare shows Antony's rhetoric to be superior by the effect he has on the plebeians.
Brutus's speech fails to convince permanently win over the crowd because he does not understand them. His first failure is at the beginning of his speech when he asks the plebeians to, "Censure me in you wisdom, and awake your senses". It seems as though he does not realize that he is speaking to an angry mob. His argument is based on cold and calculating reason. He argues that the love of freedom is stronger than the ties of friendship. "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more". This logic cannot sink deeply into an emotional mob. He asks the plebeians to "Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor that you may believe". He cannot use his honor as a reason for belief in his story when his honor is in question. Brutus fails to offer any proof of Caesar's ambition, the central point of his argument. He ends his speech with a verbal attack on any who disagree with him, essentially calling them cowards. This silences dissension temporarily but when the other side is presented it does not help his cause. Brutus's argument fails because he much less a man of the people than he would like to think.
Mark Antony's argument is a great piece of rhetoric. He successfully accomplishes his object of convincing the plebeians that Brutus is a traitor. He has mastered the use of emotion, subtlety and logic. He uses emotional phrases such as, "My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar" and "Oh judgment, thou art fled to brutish beasts". Which give him a connection with the emotion the crowd is feeling at the death of Caesar. He begins not by attacking Brutus..
Answer:
D
Explanation:
characterization is letting the reader know how a character is.
Answer:
penury (Chapter 1)
emaciated (Chapter 4)
adduced (Chapter 8)
Explanation:
I've chosen the three words above from the novel "Frankenstein" by Mary Shelley. After looking them up in a dictionary, I was able to define them as the following:
penury - oppressive lack of resources; extreme poverty.
emaciated - thin and weak due to lack of food or due to illness.
adduced - past form of adduce - to give reasons as to why you believe something to be true.
Now, let's write sentences with the same context as given in the text of the novel:
Original: [...] while the number of half-clothed children gathered about it spoke of penury in its worst shape.
New sentence: The penury that desolates the country is clearly noted in children's bare feet and bloated stomachs.
Original: My cheek had grown pale with study, and my person had become emaciated with confinement.
New sentence: Her once glowing skin was now emaciated after a whole month in the hospital.
Original: [...] and as her confusion had before been adduced as a proof of her guilt, she worked up her mind to an appearance of courage.
New sentence: My tears were adduced as proof of my feelings for the deceased young man, even though I denied knowing him at all.
Answer:
Studies on the impact of communication on marital relationships have found that partners who engage in open communication expressing personal thoughts and feelings show more relationship satisfaction and run less risk of experiencing relationship problems even in the face of dealing with a cancer diagnosis
