Answer:
Equation: x + (x+ 1) = 67
Step-by-step explanation:
We want to find two consecutive integers.
Let them be labeled as x and x + 1
We want x + (x + 1) = 67
x is the smaller number
x + 1 is the largest
We can solve for x.
x + (x + 1) = 2x + 1 = 67
2x = 66
x = 33
The largest integer is 34
0.25 or 1/4 as a fraction
I had to answer a question similar to that one on Math XL. This question was about renting a truck instead of needing a 48 mile taxi. (Took me a long time just to find the truck question, but I am giving you the truck help me answer the question, in hopes that it will help you.)
The cost of renting a truck from Hamilton Auto Rental is $47.60 per day plus $0.15 per mile. The expression 47.60 plus 0.15 m represents the cost of renting a truck for one day and driving it m miles. Evaluate 47.60 plus 0.15 m for m equals 120.
Substitute the numerical value for each variable into the expression and simplify the result.
I am sorry if that didn't help you, but it was the closest thing I could find to use to help you.
Answer:
The correct option is;
(3) The sample of track athletes show that there is a correlation between foot size and running speed
Step-by-step explanation:
The statements are analysed as follows;
(1) Smaller foot sizes cause track athletes to run slower.
The above statement is a conclusion and it infers more information than is contained in the question statement because there are other factors such as taller athletes run faster than average sized athletes
(2) The sample of track athletes shows a causal relationship between
foot size and running speed.
The above statement is similar to the one above as it is a milder conclusion and it infers more information than is contained in the question statement
(3) The sample of track athletes shows a correlation between foot size
and running speed.
The above statement is correct as is directly supported by the data as it is a statement made based directly the data
(4) There is no correlation between foot size and running speed in
track athletes.
The above statement is not supported by the available data.
Step-by-step explanation:
Number of employees in 9 years
= 870 * (1 - 0.02)⁹
= 870 * (0.98)⁹
≈ 725 employees.