Solve for the first variable in one of the equations, then substitute the result into the other equation.
Y
=
2
y
/3
−
3
x
=
−
y
/3
+
7
Hope this helped!
The tenth position is the one that goes after the decimal point.
To round a number, you have to take into account the following:
1. If the number that goes after the position we are going to round to is greater than 5, we round to the next number in that position.
2. If the number that goes after the position we are going to round to is less than 5, we round to the same number in that position.
In this case, the number that is on the tenth's position is 4. The number that is after this position is 1, which is less than 5, then we round the number in this positon to 4.
The rounded number would be:
Answer:
This is incomplete. What do you need to find? There's not enough information to figure out what to do.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
x > -7
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: Translate
Twice a number = 2x
Six more = + 6
At least = >
-8 = -8
Step 2: Write out inequality
2x + 6 > -8
Step 3: Solve
2x > - 14
x > -7
The answer is 91 toys sold, make
the number ab where a is the 10th digit and b is the first digit. The
value is 10a + b that can expressed as 10 (3) + 4 = 34
Let the price of each item: xy
10x + y
He accidentally reversed the
digits to: 10b + a toys sold at 10y + x rupees per toy. To get use the formula,
he sold 10a + b toys but thought he sold 10b + a toys. The number of toys that
he thought he left over was 72 items more than the actual amount of toys left
over. So he sold 72 more toys than he thought:
10a + b =10b + a +72
9a = 9b + 72
a = b + 8
The only numbers that could work
are a = 9 and b = 1 since a and b each have to be 1 digit numbers. He reversed
the digits and thought he sold 19 toys. So the actual number of toys sold was
10a + b = 10 (9) + 1 = 91 toys sold. By checking, he sold 91 – 19 = 72 toys
more than the amount that he though the sold. As a result, the number of toys
he thought he left over was 72 more than the actual amount left over as was
stated in the question.
<span />