data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/491ca/491cabb2ac19b4c044b2d5f3dfb3765ac30dfbc2" alt="\huge \mathfrak \blue{Solution \: - }"
The formula for area of triangle is -
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2c0d/e2c0d96522ecea330564f7b85059a6db0e6f8626" alt="\frac{1}{2} \times base \times height"
________________________________
So, the area of first triangle =
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4efc4/4efc48f52e17b4bfc40110019d8d69449ad481bb" alt="\frac{1}{2} \times base \: \times height"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cee84/cee84005dd9adc41dea780008ca0a241af3ed3ad" alt="\frac{1}{2} \times 4 \times 3"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fc09/4fc0996a5ff36760e490ed7347bf2fa95fcfcd99" alt="= \pink{6 \: units}"
________________________________
Area of second triangle =
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e3ee/9e3ee5c82f39e5f3f93493da084142d10786174d" alt="\frac{1}{2 } \times base \times height"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d394/0d3949311088f6c736565fc4fa78b26564851da2" alt="\frac{1}{2} \times 4 \times 6"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee81a/ee81aecc7d3ad5d886712263095ec0f382346009" alt="= \pink {12 \: units}"
________________________________
Area of second triangle - Area of first triangle
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1a8e/b1a8ea3233c74591e04c49a07290265e0c4040cd" alt="= 12 - 6"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74c19/74c1905d17da454bebf96348cbf1cd9924d55a0e" alt="= 6"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36335/363354161ed975f120e94d428cd1626d11f31efe" alt="\sf \underline\purple{The \: area \: increases \: by \: 6 \: square \: units.}"
Answer:
Because the absolute value of the test statistic is <u>less than</u> the positive critical value, there <u>is not</u> enough evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of discarded paper and glass for a significance level of α = 0.05.
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation matrix provided is:
Variables Paper Glass
Paper 1 0.1853
Glass 0.1853 1
Te hypothesis for the test is:
<em>H</em>₀: <em>ρ</em> = 0 vs. <em>H</em>₀: <em>ρ</em> ≠ 0
The test statistic is:
<em>r</em> = 0.1853 ≈ 0.185
As the alternate hypothesis does not specifies the direction of the test, the test is two tailed.
The critical value for the two-tailed test is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/781b8/781b889683e87a326fef1f8f0e3502845922d32e" alt="r_{\alpha/2, (n-2)}=r_{0.05/2, (62-2)}=r_{0.05/2, 60}=0.250"
The conclusion is:
Because the absolute value of the test statistic is <u>less than</u> the positive critical value, there <u>is not</u> enough evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of discarded paper and glass for a significance level of α = 0.05.
Well I don't know !
Let's get together and figure it out. Are you with me ?
You said that 8x - 2 = -9 + 7x
Add 2 to each side: 8x = -7 + 7x
Subtract 7x from each side: x = -7
Now that wasn't so bad, was it ?