Answer:
$660
Step-by-step explanation:
1: Change 5% to a decimal. (0.05)
2: Multiply 600 X 0.05 X 2(years)
3: Add 60 and 600
4: $660
Answer:
Is there a picture for this?
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
H0: p = 0.078
Ha: p ≠ 0.078
Step-by-step explanation:
The researchers say that the rate is about 7.8%, or 0.078 as a decimal. That makes that the null hypothesis because using "is" in math is the same as saying "equals" and the null hypothesis always has the statement of equality in it. The reason there is a not equals to sign in the alternate is for this reason as well. The researchers say it is about that amount, not more or less than that amount. So it makes this a 2 tailed test. If the amount is significantly higher or lower, then we might have to reject the null hypothesis depending on the outcome of the test.
24-1 = 23
6-1/4 = 5 3/4
23/5 3/4 = 4
The constant is 4, so Vanessa is correct
The answer is:
D. Vanessa is correct because the quotient when dividing the values in the bottom row by the values in the top row is always 4.
Answer:
the line pls?
Step-by-step explanation:
