1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
melisa1 [442]
2 years ago
13

Was it wrong for America to bomb Japan if so use provide evidence why

History
1 answer:
aalyn [17]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The dropping of atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 was unjust and does not respect the Just War Theory. It was a pragmatic and an effective approach, but unjust nevertheless.

You might be interested in
What aspect of the Chinese exclusion act was directed at U.S. Citizens? What was it’s purpose?
Dimas [21]

The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 was the first significant law restricting immigration into the United States. Those on the West Coast were especially prone to attribute declining wages and economic ills on the despised Chinese workers.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following describes an outcome of the French and Indian War?
Archy [21]

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Tell me about Anglo American Ranching
Triss [41]

Explanation:

Anglo American are people who are English-Speaking inhabitants of Anglo-America

8 0
3 years ago
Why did george f. kennan believed that containment was the best response to soviet expansion?
marin [14]
 He believed<span> that the soviet union </span>would<span> not risk war to expand communism.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Gibbons v. Ogden, a state
puteri [66]

According to Gibbons v. Ogden, a state <u>can not interfere with the power of congress to regulate commerce.</u>

<u>Explanation</u>:

The case of Gibbons and the Ogden was presented in the Supreme Court in the United States of America. It was in the year 1824 and was one of the most important cases of that time.

According to this case, a principle was established and it established a legislative enactment. According to this, a state could not interfere in the power of the congress and the power that was talked about in this principle was about interfering with the regulation of the commerce. It was only in the hand of the congress and not with the states.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following Is NOT something enjoyed by Romans?
    11·2 answers
  • What strategic waterway off the iberian peninsula is controlled by the united kingdom?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the counterclaim in the crisis no. 1 by thomas paine?
    13·2 answers
  • How did latin america change as a result of european imperialism in the late 19th century
    8·1 answer
  • Life in Virgina
    11·1 answer
  • ano ang pamahalaang pambansa ay hinati sa maliit na yunit upang higit na mapadali ang pamamahala sa bansa​
    15·2 answers
  • How can you use the graph to find the marginal cost when production goes
    7·1 answer
  • 20 POINTS. What roles did the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson have in shaping American politics and identity
    15·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of the preamble to the constitution?
    5·1 answer
  • Why do you think the bantu education law is important to know about today?​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!