Implementation hiding i<u>s the encapsulation of method details within a class</u>. Implementation can be interpreted as those specifications which can be altered without altering the correctness of an application. Wrapping data/methods within classes (descriptions of the way all objects of this type will look/act) in combination with implementation hiding is called encapsulation. Information users need to know about behaviors should be available without dependence on implementation specifications.
Answer:
oid changeCase (char char_array[], int array_size ) {
__asm{
mov eax, char_array;
mov edi, 0;
readArray:
cmp edi, array_size;
jge exit;
mov ebx, edi;
shl ebx, 2;
mov cl, [eax + ebx];
check:
//working on it
cmp cl, 0x41;
jl next_indx;
cmp cl, 0x7A;
jg next_indx;
cmp cl, 'a';
jl convert_down;
jge convert_up;
convert_down:
or cl, 0x20; //make it lowercase
jmp write;
convert_up:
and cl, 0x20;
jmp write;
write:
mov byte ptr [eax + ebx], cl
next_indx:
inc edi;
exit:
cmp edi, array_size;
jl readArray;
mov char_array, eax;
}
}
Explanation:
- Move char_array to eax as it is base image
.
- Use ebx as offset
.
- Use ecx as the storage register
.
- check if cl is <= than ASCII value 65 (A)
.
To Change the Drop Shadow Just Go to effects on the photo go to drop shadow than change the spread and Distinse and Opasity.
Answer:
The answer is option A.
Explanation:
Negative numbers can be found by binary search, this makes option B incorrect.
Unsorted and randomized lists are also not things that support a binary search, options C and D are incorrect.
Binary search uses a technique where the middle element of the list is located and used to determine whether the search should be done within the lower indexed part of the list or the higher. So for a list to be binary search-able, it should be sorted and not randomized.
The answer is A.
I hope this helps.
