Answer:
The correct answer is C. the decline in the economic value of an asset over time
Explanation:
Depreciation : Depreciation is a decreasing value of the asset due to tear and wear, obsolesce, usage, etc
It is charged on the fixed assets which include plant and machinery, furniture and fixtures, building, computer, equipment, etc.
The sum of gross and net investment is not called the depreciation because gross investment is an expenditure which is incurred on new purchase while net investment is a difference between gross investment and deprecation. So, option B is incorrect.
Depreciation should not be charged on intangible assets because in intangible asset, the amortization is charged. Thus, option B is incorrect.
The decrease in the general price level is disinflation or inflation decreased. So, option D is also wrong
Hence, The correct answer is C. the decline in the economic value of an asset over time
Answer:
Journal entry recording the interest
Debit Credit
Interest Expense $7,350
Cash $7,000
Interest Payable $350
As $7,000 is paid from the total expense of $7,350. Remaining interest of $350 is recorded as liability in interest payable account.
Answer:
ability motivation suitability
Explanation:
Answer:
Salt's basis = -$3900 from a 50% sharing basis
Explanation:
profit sharing ratio as per contributions is 50%:50%
ordinary loss - $5000
tax exempt income -$2000
Charitable contribution -$800
Taxable loss =$7800
profit(loss) share
Salt = -3900
Pepper =-3900
Answer:
The question is actually missing (see attached image):
the answer is:
D. Less than that of its competitors.
Explanation:
Personally, I believe that GM is an extremely spoiled child that refuses to assume responsibility for its continuous and never ending mistakes. GM has either filed for bankruptcy or threatened to do so twice in the last 30 years or so, and every time the US government has to bail them out. But GM keeps doing things wrong.
It doesn't matter if you like their cars or not, GM is terribly managed. No other company in US history has received so much financial aid from the government and continued to lose money and work inefficiently. The problem is that whenever things go wrong, stockholders lose their money but the executives keep getting tens of millions of dollars. If a company is managed in such a disastrous way, their top management shouldn't get paid that much.
A car factory costs a lot of money, and not using it efficiently is outrageous considering GM's history. If they had never received a cent from the government, then its only their problem. But the government lost $11.2 billion on GM's last bailout. During the 1980s GM lobbied fro the government to impose import quotas on Japanese cars because they were better cars and GM couldn't compete against them. So whenever they do things wrong, big brother has to help them. During the last couple of years GM had to sell most of its foreign operations in order to get cash, and you generally do not make money by selling your assets.