Explanation:
<u><em>i will focus to them of what he do or they do that not know them that i keep watching they do everything.It because i didn't like that kind of ability liying to everyone can't work fairlly it's so unfair.</em></u>
Answer:
There is little publicity compared with Acts of Parliament which may mean people are unaware a ruling exists. Control by Parliament isn't always effective. Few affirmative resolutions exist and MP's are too busy to look over them, and controls are often not used anyway. There is a lack of scrutiny.
Explanation:
Answer:
it's the wife because if it was anyone else she would've heard them and called the police alot earlier
ANSWER:
Yes, Miranda could be tried twice again for the same crime.
EXPLANATION:
After the Supreme Court ruling, Miranda retracted his confession, was tried again by the state of Arizona, found guilty and sent to prison. His retrial, based on a prisoner's successful appeal, did not constitute “double jeopardy” according to the court.
goodluck, support me by marking as brainliest!! :)
Answer:
a) The parties to the contract know too much about their particular interests and as a result, the terms of the contract are not necessarily fair.
Explanation:
