Group of answer choices.
A. Is not warm enough to the applicants.
B. Is perceived as less credible because she is an HR specialist.
C. Does not give applicants enough information, leaving them with more questions than answers.
D. Comes off as being too professional for someone in the HR field.
E. Is not approaching the candidate with enough skepticism.
Answer:
B. Is perceived as less credible because she is an HR specialist.
Explanation:
Human resources (HR) can be defined as an art of managing, controlling and improving the number of people (employees or workers), functions, activities which are being used effectively and efficiently by an organization.
Hence, human resources managers are saddled with the responsibility of managing and improving the welfare and working conditions of the employees working in an organization.
In this scenario, Maria is well respected among her peers for her professional standards and understanding of the HR field. She noticed that when she recruits engineers for her company, they sometimes seem unresponsive to her. Thus, the most likely reason for this is because Maria is perceived as less credible because she is an HR specialist and as such is considered not to have a deep understanding of the field of engineering to recruit a qualified and experienced candidate.
Answer:
The correct answer is option (A).
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the computation of the given data are as follows:
First, we will calculate the Market risk premium, then
Market risk premium = (Required return - Risk free rate ) ÷ beta
= ( 9.50% - 4.20%) ÷ 1.05 = 5.048%
So, now Required rate of return for new portfolio = Risk free rate + Beta of new portfolio × Market premium risk
Where, Beta of new portfolio = (10 ÷ 18.5) × 1.05 + (8.5 ÷ 18.5) × 0.65
= 0.5676 + 0.2986
= 0.8662
By putting the value, we get
Required rate of return = 4.20% + 0.8662 × 5.048%
= 8.57%
<span>Government increases the tax rate.
Consumers have less money to spend.
</span>Producers manufacture fewer goods.
Inflationary pressure decreases.<span>
</span>
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
In simple words, Regardless of the expense of making guitars, the technique reduces the total cost of manufacturing a instrument. Phoenix would be in the production business of instruments, not pickups.
The target of this technique is therefore the entire guitar, not really the pickups. The smaller the process of manufacturing their instruments, the better manoeuvrability they have on the market. When they have reduced costs, they may change rates downwards in order to capture further market penetration.
Answer: reduce output.
Explanation:
In a competitive market, firms do not have control over the price that they sell their goods in the market but they do have control over their costs. It is recommended to produce/ sell goods at a quantity where Marginal Revenue will equal Marginal cost (MR = MC).
In a Competitive Market, Price is the same as Marginal revenue which means that Marginal revenue here is $25 and the Marginal Cost is $26. At this quantity of output, the Marginal Cost is larger than the Marginal revenue.
Company should therefore reduce output to a quantity where Marginal Cost will equal Marginal revenue.
