I assume your talking about the HUNS... When the empire split in two the east had more gold and more resources and the dying west had to suffer all the barbarian attacks like the huns... The East quite simply was more prepared and had more walls and guards to defend their border also the Eastern Empire had the river danube north of them which helped deflect the Hunnic invasions and other barbarian invasion more west...
Answer:
The England's Golden Age or Elizabethan England, an era of peace and prosperity when the arts had a chance to blossom with Elizabeth's support.
Explanation:
she once said, “I know I have the body of a weak and feeble woman, but I have the heart and stomach of a king, and of a king of England too.”
Answer:
opposing the collectivization of land
Explanation:
The Kulaks were the peasants that were the most prosperous, that new and put in a lot of effort to develop their land, gain more land, and become wealthier because of it. The Soviets though didn't fancied this, as their policy was that everyone should have the same amount of land, and that collectivization should be done to the land. The Kulaks of course opposed this, as they worked very hard to develop and buy their land and cattle, and now they had to give it up tot he others that were less capable than them just because Stalin ordered so. Stalin was not a man that liked to be opposed, so in order to perform the collectivization without any problem, he ordered the deportation and elimination of the Kulaks. The end result was millions of people ending up dead, which were also the most capable people in the rural areas, and that made a big long-term damage to the agriculture and economy of the Soviet Union.
Answer: Mexico claimed that the southern boundary of Texas was the Nueces River, the Texan boundary while under Mexican rule. Americans, as well as the incoming President, claimed that the boundary of Texas was the Rio Grande River. ... President Polk's true goal was to acquire the rich ports of California.
Explanation:
“The Constitution gave too
much power to a central government” best describes the anti-federalist
view of the constitution.
Anti<span>-Federalism<span> refers
to a movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government
and which later opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. The previous
constitution, called the Articles of Confederation, gave state governments more
authority.</span></span>
I am hoping that this answer has
satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in your endeavor, and if
you would like, feel free to ask another question.
