They didn't want to end slavery, because slavery made their lives that much easier.
exg bankers had shark tons of money, so they bought slaves and had the slaves clean, tend to their needs, etc.
merchants could have slaves carry their stock.
mill owners needed alot of man power back in the day to get things going to produce a fair amount of output into the market, and paying good looking muscular men was much more expensive than one time buying a few slaves and having them work hard.
unskilled workers might have wanted slaves because then they didn't need to learn the given skill, they could have a slave do it FOR them.
The answer is: The decision affirmed the protection of symbolic speech.
Tinker v. Des Moines revolved around an activism movements that conducted by students led by Mary Beth Tinker. She organized the students to wear black arm bands to school in protest of the vietnam war.
At that time, the school admins shut down the activism since they see that wearing an armband is not a 'speech' and cannot be protected under the first amendment.
They later on brought the case to the court. The court decided that wearing an armband is a form of symbolic speech that is included under the protection of the first amendment.
Answer:
The US victory in the Spanish American War resulted in the Us gaining possession and/or control of many new territories. These and other territorial gains resulted in the creation of a new far flung empire. ... In 1895 Hawaii became a US territory.
The author uses words such as valiantly that have strong emotional connotations of courage and respect <span />
