The number:
is going to be between the numbers 563 and 564; since 10 squared equals 100 and the decimal point will move to places to the right.
Therefore, the answer is D.
Yes -97.6590 is less than -90 29/44
Answer:
trump is trustworthy and he is honest so yes he is what we need
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
- A
- B
<h3>
Step-by-step explanation:</h3>
1. A decrease of 3.8% is equivalent to a multiplier fraction of -0.038. The only answer choice that has such a multiplier is A.
In an instance such as this, the "rate" is usually some (fractional) change in some period of time. Since the exponent must be unitless, the rate is effectively (some fraction) "per year" so that multiplying by "t" years cancels the units and results in a pure number.
___
<em>Comment on the exponential</em>
If the actual change were -3.8% per year, the exponential term would look like (1 - 0.038)^t = 0.962^t. By writing it as e^(-0.038t), the decrease is effectively compounded continuously. As a result, over a year's time, the decrease is actually about 3.73%, not 3.8%.
_____
2. If ║x/2║ is a magnitude function, answer choices B and D are equivalent. Thus, we must assume it is a "greatest integer" function. Then the number of desserts prepared will be ║x/2║, and the corresponding revenue will be 1.2║x/2║. Since x is in minutes, 2 to 4 hours will be 120–240 minutes. The appropriate choice is B.
It asks to "Find the unit price in dollars per padlock"
The phrasing "dollars per padlock" is the same as "dollars per 1 padlock"
In other words, the teacher wants to know how much 1 padlock costs.
7 padlocks : $23.80
7/7 padlocks : $23.80/7 .... divide both parts by 7
1 padlock : $3.40
We see that 1 padlock costs $3.40, so the unit cost is $3.40 per padlock
