Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
$3000 * 0.04 = $120
$100 * 0.02 = $20
total 2 accounts = $120 + $20 = $140
answer: $3000 was the originally deposited into the account that pays 4% interest.
Let
s-------> <span>represent the number of sheep
g-------> </span><span>represent the number of goats
we know that
1) </span><span>Morgan moves no more than 26 of her sheep and goats into another field
so
(s+g) </span><span>≤ 26------> inequality 1
2) </span><span>Fewer than 14 of her animals are sheep
so
s < 14-------> inequality 2
therefore
the answers are
</span><span>B.) s < 14
</span><span>D.) s + g ≤ 26</span>
Answer:
Here's what I get.
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Representation of data
I used Excel to create a scatterplot of the data, draw the line of best fit, and print the regression equation.
2. Line of best fit
(a) Variables
I chose arm span as the dependent variable (y-axis) and height as the independent variable (x-axis).
It seems to me that arm span depends on your height rather than the other way around.
(b) Regression equation
The calculation is easy but tedious, so I asked Excel to do it.
For the equation y = ax + b, the formulas are

This gave the regression equation:
y = 1.0595x - 4.1524
(c) Interpretation
The line shows how arm span depends on height.
The slope of the line says that arm span increases about 6 % faster than height.
The y-intercept is -4. If your height is zero, your arm length is -4 in (both are impossible).
(d) Residuals

The residuals appear to be evenly distributed above and below the predicted values.
A graph of all the residuals confirms this observation.
The equation usually predicts arm span to within 4 in.
(e) Predictions
(i) Height of person with 66 in arm span

(ii) Arm span of 74 in tall person

Answer:
x=2/3, x=3/2
Step-by-step explanation:
6x^2-13x=-6
6x^2-13x+6=0
6x^2-4x-9x+6=0
2x*(3x-2)-3(3x-2)=0
(3x-2)8(2x-3)=0
3x-2=0
2x-3=0
x=2/3
x=3/2
1/36 because there are 6 sides and the you are trying to figure out what the probiblity of rolling 1 out of 6 is