The statement is "True".
It is normal, when tuning in to another person talk, to
figure an answer while the other individual is as yet talking. This implies the
individual is not by any stretch of the imagination tuning in to all that is
being said. Even good audience members are regularly blameworthy of
fundamentally assessing what is being said before completely understanding the
message that the speaker is attempting to convey. The outcome is that
suspicions are made and conclusions came to about the speaker's implying that
may be incorrect.
The prominent issue in the American colonies was taxation without representation, although there were many other issues among those.
Answer:
B) systematic observation
Explanation:
The options for this question are missing. The options are:
A) self-report
B) systematic observation
C) sampling behavior with tasks
D) interview
In research, the term systematic observation refers to a process to get data by which t<u>he researcher makes observations of the subjects of the study in an objective way</u>, not considering the researcher own prejudices by collecting data without biases from the researcher (which would come from the interpretation of the observations).
In this example Irina watches 10 babies once a month from birth to 2 years of age and writes down the sounds they make and the words they use. We can see that <u>she is observing the babies in an objective and close way and by writing down the sounds and words she is actually taking an objective measure of language development</u>. Therefore this would be an example of systematic observation.
Answer: It shows whether a decision will produce more gains than losses
Explanation:
I got it right APEX
