Answer:
The net benefit is -$26,000
Explanation:
Given the above information,
The total cost of manufacturing 12,000 circuit boards
= 12,000 × $34
= $408,000
Total purchase price
= 12,000 × $34
= $408,000
Fixed overhead cost applied
= 12,000 × $6
= $72,000
The rental income = $46,000
Outsourcing cost
= Total purchase price + Fixed overhead cost applied - Rental income
= $408,000 + $72,000 - $46,000
= $434,000
Therefore, Net benefit
= Total cost of manufacturing - Outsourcing cost
=$408,000 - $434,000
= -$26,000
<span>Sales during the last four periods are in the order from older to recent as 100, 200, 130, and 300.
Moving average is a successive average calculated from the successive segments.
So the third month moving average MA3 = (200 + 130 + 300) / 3 = 630 / 3 = 210
So the answer is 210.</span>
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
calculating the increase in the net operating income is as follows:
S.no Particulars and explanation Amount
1. Sales ( $268000 + 84000 ) 352000
2. Contribution ( 1 multiply with 40 percent) 140000
3. Fied expense ( $119200 plus $6200 ) 125400
4. Net operating income ( 2 step minus 3 step) $14600
therefore, net operating income increased by $ 14600 plus $12000
Note: the sales were not given, so i have taken or assumed. Please change the figure if there is different figure of sales in the question given.
Answer:
c. liable on the ground that Mesa is an intended third-party beneficiary
Explanation:
In a contract, the third-party beneficiary is a business or a person that benefits from the agreement and the terms of the contract that is made between the two other parties. According to law, third-party beneficiary have certain rights which they can enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.
In the context, Mesa is a third party beneficiary. The Mesa County enters into a contract with New Construct Inc. to construct a court house. Now New Construct Inc. again hires the firm Odell to excavate the land site.
While excavating Odell damages few nearby properties, so Mesa County files a law suit against Odell. But Odell argues that Odell is not in agreement with Mesa County or have not entered into with any contract with the County, so Mesa cannot sue the excavator.
But the court hold that as Mesa County is the third party beneficiary of the contract and have certain rights, Odell is held liable for the loss and should compensate for the loss to the County.
Answer:
$237,500
Explanation:
Cost of building $10,000,000
Avoidable Interest $300,000
Less;Salvage value ($800,000)
Depreciation Cost $9,500,000
Depreciation per year $9,500,000/40=$237,500
