Answer:
Being able to find other entrepreneurs that are interested in the same target market, learning from their experience, asking for their help and building PR relations
Answer:
Kindly check explanation
Explanation:
Using table for our evaluation :
____________POLLUTANT
Factories___P1 ______P2 ____COST
__1_______0.1______ 0.45 ___ 1500
__2______ 0.2 _____ 0.25 ____1000
__3 ______0.40 ____ 0.30 ____2000
_________ ≥ 30 ____ ≥ 40 _____ z
Let amount of waste produced by Factories 1, 2 and 3 equal f1, f2 and f3 respectively.
Linear Program that will minimize the cost of reducing pollution by the desired amounts
Min cost:
min z = 1500f1 + 1000f2 + 2000f3
0.1f1 + 0.2f2 + 0.4f3 ≥ 30
0.45f1 + 0.25f2 + 0.3f3 ≥ 40
f1, f2, f3 ≥ 0
Because of the formal request made, the President of the University is the:
<h3>Who is an Initiator? </h3>
This refers to a person who makes the first offer for a thing or starts off negotiations or requests.
With this in mind and from the given question, we can see that because the president of the University made the formal request for additional computers, then he is the initiator.
Read more about initiator here:
brainly.com/question/2665859
Answer:
Debit interest expenses for $15,000
Credit interest payable for $15,000
Explanation:
Since January 1 to June 30 is 6 months, we need to calculate interest expenses for the 6 months as follows:
Monthly interest expenses = ($500,000 * 6%) / 12 = $2,500
Interest expenses for 6 months = $2,500 * 6 = $15,000
The adjusting entry required will therefore look as follws:
<u>Date Particulars Dr ($) Cr ($) </u>
June 30 Interest expenses 15,000
Interest payable 15,000
<u> (</u><em><u>To record 6 months interest payable on note.) </u></em><u> </u>
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": This is an ethical dilemma because both the customer and the company have legitimate concerns.
Explanation:
An ethical dilemma is situation that entails an apparent mental conflict between moral legitimate concerns, in which one would transgress another. These concerns can be refuted in different ways, for instance by showing that the alleged ethical dilemma is only apparent and does not actually exist, or that the solution to the ethical dilemma involves choosing the greater good and the lesser evil.
